esc
Search documents
go
Browse entities
go
Corpus stats
go
About the data
go
AI settings
go
EFTA
Search
Search
Entities
About
Stats
Settings
⌘K
search
Search
Search syntax help
Dataset
Set 1
Set 2
Set 3
Set 4
Set 5
Set 6
Set 7
Set 8
Set 9
Set 10
Set 11
Set 12
Sort
Relevance
Most pages
Most words
Dataset
Newest
Oldest
Status
All
Extracted
Failed
DOJ Status
All
Removed
Available
Modified
Date Range
Undated only
–
Email Headers
Page Count
–
Saved Searches
+
435 results for “
"the Court of Appeals"
”
Export
Keyboard Shortcuts
/
Focus search
Esc
Blur input
O
Open PDF
←
→
Paginate
Corpus: 1990-03-17 – 2025-12-01
←
August 2019
→
Mo
Tu
We
Th
Fr
Sa
Su
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Undated
(150,429)
None
Light
Medium
Heavy
EFTA00032349
Dataset 8
2019-08-12
6p
2,814w
Subject:
UN Bribery Ruling Further Defines The Limits Of McDonnell
From:
New York Law360 <
[email protected]
>
To:
>
From: New York Law360 <
[email protected]
> To: > Subject: UN Bribery Ruling Further Defines The Limits Of McDonnell Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 09:24:32 +0000 ;law360 New York NEW YORK Monday, August 12, 2019 Law360 TOP NEWS ;law360 Pro Say Podcast Analysis UN Bribery Ruling Further Defines The Limits Of McDonnell The Second Circuit closed the door on defendants hoping to invoke the U.S. Supreme Court's McDonnell ruling in Foreign Corrupt Practices Act cases…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00032349.pdf
EFTA00826051
Dataset 9
2016-06-07
6p
2,458w
Subject:
Fwd: Alert: Cayman Director Liability in the U.S.
From:
Richard Kahn
To:
"Jeffrey E." <
[email protected]
>
From: Richard Kahn To: "Jeffrey E." <
[email protected]
> Subject: Fwd: Alert: Cayman Director Liability in the U.S. Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 20:35:15 +0000 Richard Kahn Forwarded message From: Sadis & Goldberg Securities Litigation Group Date: Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 10:09 AM Sub'ect: Alert: Cayman Director Liability in the U.S. To: SECURITIES LITIGATION ALERT JUNE 7, 2016 For further information about this Alert, please Cayman Director Liability in contact: the U.S. Douglas…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00826051.pdf
EFTA00019249
Dataset 8
2019-06-18
3p
897w
Subject:
FW: WASHINGTON POST; Jeffrey Epstein's scandal of secrecy points to a creeping rot in the
From: To: Subject: FW: WASHINGTON POST; Jeffrey Epstein's scandal of secrecy points to a creeping rot in the American justice system Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 20:34:15 +0000 Importance: Normal Just FYI. From: Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2019 4:34 PM To: Subject: WASHINGTON POST; Jeffrey Epstein's scandal of secrecy points to a creeping rot in the American justice system Jeffrey Epstein's scandal of secrecy points to a creeping rot in the American justice system…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00019249.pdf
EFTA00086564
Dataset 9
2021-07-29
10p
2,129w
Subject:
Jeffrey Epstein & Chislaine Maxwell:
From:
"Randolph T. (The New York Times Customer Care)" <
[email protected]
>
From: "Randolph T. (The New York Times Customer Care)" <
[email protected]
> Cc: Subject: Jeffrey Epstein & Chislaine Maxwell: Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 01:23:04 +0000 ##- Please type your reply above this line -## You are registered as a CC on this support request (1640314). Reply to this email to add a comment to the request. Randolph T. (The New York Times Customer Care) Dear Richard, Thank you for contacting Customer Care at The New York Times. We value your…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00086564.pdf
EFTA00086554
Dataset 9
2021-07-29
10p
2,142w
Subject:
FW: Jeffrey Epstein & Chislaine Maxwell:
From:
"Randolph T. (The New York Times Customer Care)" <
[email protected]
>
From: To: Subject: FW: Jeffrey Epstein & Chislaine Maxwell: Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 15:41:42 +0000 FYI. From: "Randolph T. (The New York Times Customer Care)" <
[email protected]
> Date: July 28, 2021at 9:23:15 PM EDT Cc: Subject: Jeffrey Epstein & Chislaine Maxwell: Reply-To: The New York Times Customer Care <
[email protected]
> It k- Please type your reply above this line -0 0 You are registered as a CC on this support request (1640314). Reply to…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00086554.pdf
EFTA00090528
Dataset 9
2021-07-29
10p
2,182w
Subject:
Re: Jeffrey Epstein & Chislaine Maxwell:
From:
"Randolph T. (The New York Times Customer Care)"
From To Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein & Chislaine Maxwell: Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 08:44:07 +0000 I would send it to the PC chiefs. typically refers this type of thing to the relevant chiefs anyway (she may have already done so here, as it appears at least one Civilian Crime Report was already completed), and they'll be the best positioned to assess what (if any) follow up is appropriate. On Jul 28, 2021, at 10:30 PM, >…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00090528.pdf
EFTA00314991
Dataset 9
2012-06-19
35p
25,593w
…De Novo heightened concerns, a court must account for Criminal Law the Fourth Amendments rights of travelers. Evidence wrongfully obtained U.S.C.A. Const.Amend. 4.
The Court of Appeals
reviews reasonable Cases that cite this headnote suspicion determinations de novo, reviewing findings of historical fact for clear error and giving due weight to inferences drawn from [19] Customs Duties those facts by resident judges and local law Scope and Nature; Successive or enforcement officers. U.S.C.A…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00314991.pdf
EFTA01363335
Dataset 10
1p
537w
Page 19 2014 V.I. LEXIS 45, *; 61 V.I. 13, ** expressly define a marital homestead, both the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit and the Appellate Division of the United States District Court for the Virgin Islands have interpreted § 2305(a), (c) to hold that a "marital homestead" is any homestead in which a husband and wife both reside during the marriage and that is owned by one or both of the spouses. Civil Procedure >…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01363335.pdf
EFTA01363337
Dataset 10
1p
543w
Page 21 2014 V.I. LEXIS 45, *. 61 V.I. 13, ** distribution, the court also has broad discretion to consider the case's most salient facts. The Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands further refined the court's discretion to divide property by eliminating marital fault as a factor in dividing the homestead. The doctrine of equitable distribution is applied to effectuate a fair and just division of the property between the parties. As its name suggests, equitable distribution does…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01363337.pdf
EFTA01386895
Dataset 10
2018-02-09
1p
771w
RIN II •094 Alpha Group Capital LLC the Issuer, the Co-Issuer and the Placement Agent do not assume any responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or applicability of such information. The U.S. Risk Retention Regulations require the "sponsor" (the "Sponsor") of a "securitization transaction" to retain (either directly or through its "majority-owned affiliates") not less than 5% of the "credit risk" of "securitized assets" (as such terms are defined in the U.S. Risk Retention Regulations). For purposes…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01386895.pdf
EFTA01386878
Dataset 10
2016-12-24
1p
755w
RIN II • 094 Alpha Group Capital LLC Preferred Shares—Purchase Restrictions". In the event that a Preferred Share Purchaser fails to fund a Contribution, the Issuer will have the right to exercise certain remedies with respect to such Preferred Shareholder. See "—Risks Relating to the Issuer—Uncertainty of Asset Accumulation." U.S. Risk Retention Regulations Section 941 of the Dodd-Frank Act amended the Exchange Act to require the "securitizer" of asset-backed securities to retain at least 5% of…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01386878.pdf
EFTA00028060
Dataset 8
2020-09-16
2p
225w
Case 20-2413. Document 107. 09/11/2020. 2929023, Pagel of 2 S.D.N.Y. 20-2413 Loretta A. Preska, 3. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 11th day of September, two thousand twenty. Plaintiff:Appellee, ORDER v. 20-2413 Ghislaine Maxwell…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00028060.pdf
EFTA00209741
Dataset 9
2014-04-18
23p
5,318w
…also explained that three traditional routes of immediate review could still afford the claimant of the privilege adequate relief in a civil action: the claimant could ask the district court to certify the appeal of "a controlling question of law," the resolution of which "may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation"; the claimant could petition
the court of appeals
for a writ of mandamus; or the claimant could defy a disclosure order and appeal a sanction for contempt…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00209741.pdf
EFTA00208553
Dataset 9
1992-05-13
6p
2,669w
…As noted above, one of the reasons behind 6(e) is to protect the reputations of persons who are under investigation but not indicted. This is a corollary to what
the Court of Appeals
found to be a due process protection afforded by the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution — namely, "that the liberty and property concepts of the Fifth Amendment protect an individual from being publicly and officially accused of having committed a serious crime, particularly where the…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00208553.pdf
EFTA00180294
Dataset 9
2011-07-29
213p
54,066w
To:
Company; Pax #: Direct #:
07/29/2011 13:11 FAX E6 0 0 1 /004 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP Fax Transmittal 300 North LaSalle Street Chicago, Illinois 60654 Phone: (312) 882-2000 Fax: (312) 862-2200 Please notify us Immediately if any pages are not received. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS COMMUNICATION IS CONFIDENTIAL, MAY BE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED, MAY CONSTITUTE INSIDE INFORMATION, AND IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE ADDRESSEE. UNAUTHORIZED USE, DISCLOSURE OR COPYING IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED AND MAY BE UNLAWFUL…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00180294.pdf
EFTA00209632
Dataset 9
2014-04-18
24p
5,766w
…also explained that three traditional routes of immediate review could still afford the claimant of the privilege adequate relief in a civil action: the claimant could ask the district court to certify the appeal of "a controlling question of law," the resolution of which "may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation"; the claimant could petition
the court of appeals
for a writ of mandamus; or the claimant could defy a disclosure order and appeal a sanction for contempt…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00209632.pdf
EFTA00208546
Dataset 9
1992-05-13
6p
2,643w
…As noted above, one of the reasons behind 6(e) is to protect the reputations of persons who are under investigation but not indicted. This is a corollary to what
the Court of Appeals
found to be a due process protection afforded by the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution — namely, "that the liberty and property concepts of the Fifth Amendment protect an individual from being publicly and officially accused of having committed a serious crime, particularly where the…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00208546.pdf
EFTA00087971
Dataset 9
2020-09-16
2p
225w
Case 20-2413. Document 107. 09/11/2020. 2929023, Pagel of 2 S.D.N.Y. 20-2413 Loretta A. Preska, J. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 11th day of September, two thousand twenty. Plaintiff-Appellee, ORDER v. 20-2413 Ghislaine Maxwell…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00087971.pdf
EFTA00598071
Dataset 9
2002-11-27
12p
8,068w
…underlying this distinction, and its relationship to supporting organizations in particular, has been encapsulated by
the Court of Appeals
for the Seventh Circuit: Public charities were excepted from private foundation status on the theory that their exposure to public scrutiny and their dependence on public support would keep them from the abuses to which private foundations were subject. Supporting organizations are similarly excepted in so far as they are subject to the scrutiny of a public charity. The Treasury Regulations…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00598071.pdf
EFTA00091437
Dataset 9
2020-09-16
2p
225w
Case 20-2413. Document 107. 09/11/2020. 2929023, Pagel of 2 S.D.N.Y. 20-2413 Loretta A. Preska, J. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 11th day of September, two thousand twenty. Plaintiff-Appellee, ORDER v. 20-2413 Ghislaine Maxwell…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00091437.pdf
1–20 of 435 results · page 1 of 22
«
←
1
2
…
22
→
»
Results by Dataset
435 total
Set 8
35
Set 9
351
Set 10
37
Set 11
12