EFTA00205560Dataset 9
2011-08-1223p7,201w
…PLEA NEGOTIATIONS ARE INADMISSIBLE, THE PLAINTIFFS BEAR THE BURDEN OF PARTICULARIZING A PROPER BASIS FOR DISCOVERY When a discovery request seeks "information subject to exclusion under the Federal Rules of Evidence, such as settlement information, ... many courts shift the burden to the requesting party, requiring them to make a particularized showing that the inadmissible evidence is likely to lead to admissible evidence." Reist v. Source Interlink Co., 2010 WL 4940096 at *2 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 29, 2010); Bottaro v…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00205560.pdf
EFTA00301881Dataset 9
2011-08-1223p6,632w
…ARE INADMISSIBLE, THE PLAINTIFFS BEAR THE BURDEN OF PARTICULARIZING A PROPER BASIS FOR DISCOVERY When a discovery request seeks "information subject to exclusion under the Federal Rules of Evidence, such as settlement information, . . . many courts shift the burden to the requesting party, requiring them to make a particularized showing that the inadmissible evidence is likely to lead to admissible evidence." Reist v. Source Interlink Co., 2010 WL 4940096 at *2 (M. Fla. Nov. 29, 2010); Bottaro v. Hatton Assocs., 96…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00301881.pdf
EFTA00301856Dataset 9
2011-08-1225p6,961w
…ARE INADMISSIBLE, THE PLAINTIFFS BEAR THE BURDEN OF PARTICULARIZING A PROPER BASIS FOR DISCOVERY When a discovery request seeks "information subject to exclusion under the Federal Rules of Evidence, such as settlement information, . . . many courts shift the burden to the requesting party, requiring them to make a particularized showing that the inadmissible evidence is likely to lead to admissible evidence." Reist v. Source Interlink Co., 2010 WL 4940096 at *2 (M. Fla. Nov. 29, 2010); Bottaro v. Hatton Assocs., 96…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00301856.pdf
EFTA00205661Dataset 9
2012-04-2320p6,184w
…they can "discover the correspondence now and the court can sort out trial admissibility issues later." [DE 106 at 5]. But as we stated in our initial pleading, when a discovery request seeks information that is subject to exclusion, "many courts shift the burden to the requesting party, requiring them to make a particularized showing that the inadmissible evidence is likely to lead to admissible evidence." Reist. Source Interlink Co., 2010 WL 4940096 at *2 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 29…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00205661.pdf
EFTA01168497Dataset 9
2011-08-1214p6,706w
…B. BECAUSE PLEA NEGOTIATIONS ARE INADMISSIBLE, THE PLAINTIFFS BEAR THE BURDEN OF PARTICULARIZING A PROPER BASIS FOR DISCOVERY When a discovery request seeks "information subject to exclusion under the Federal Rules of Evidence, such as settlement information, . . many courts shift the burden to the requesting party, requiring them to make a particularized showing that the inadmissible evidence is likely to lead to admissible evidence." Reist v. Source Interlink Co. , 2010 WL 4940096 at *2 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 29, 2010)…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01168497.pdf
EFTA00301909Dataset 9
2011-08-1215p6,743w
…Bear The Burden of Particularizing A Proper Basis For Discovery When a discovery request seeks information subject to exclusion under the Federal Rules of Evidence, such as settlement information, . . . many courts shift the burden to the requesting party, requiring them to make a particularized showing that the inadmissible evidence is likely to lead to admissible evidence. Reist v. Source Interlink Co., 2010 WL 4940096 at '2 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 29, 2010); Bottaro v. Hatton Assocs., 96 F.R.D…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00301909.pdf
EFTA01098398Dataset 9
2011-08-1223p7,208w
…PLEA NEGOTIATIONS ARE INADMISSIBLE, THE PLAINTIFFS BEAR THE BURDEN OF PARTICULARIZING A PROPER BASIS FOR DISCOVERY When a discovery request seeks "information subject to exclusion under the Federal Rules of Evidence, such as settlement information, ... many courts shift the burden to the requesting party, requiring them to make a particularized showing that the inadmissible evidence is likely to lead to admissible evidence." Reist v. Source Interlink Co., 2010 WL 4940096 at *2 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 29, 2010); Bottaro v…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01098398.pdf
EFTA01098374Dataset 9
2011-08-1224p7,396w
…PLEA NEGOTIATIONS ARE INADMISSIBLE, TILE PLAINTIFFS BEAR TIIE BURDEN OF PARTICULARIZING A PROPER BASIS FOR DISCOVERY When a discovery request seeks "information subject to exclusion under the Federal Rules of Evidence, such as settlement information, ... many courts shift the burden to the requesting party, requiring them to make a particularized showing that the inadmissible evidence is likely to lead to admissible evidence." Reist v. Source Interlink Co., 2010 WL 4940096 at *2 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 29, 2010); Bottaro v…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01098374.pdf
EFTA01098060Dataset 9
2008-07-1119p6,021w
…discover the correspondence now and the court can sort out trial admissibility issues later." [DE 106 at 5]. But as we stated in our initial pleading, when a discovery request seeks information that is subject to exclusion, "many courts shift the burden to the requesting party, requiring them to make a particularized showing that the inadmissible evidence is likely to lead to admissible evidence." Reist v. Source Interlink Co., 2010 WL 4940096 at *2 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 29, 2010)…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01098060.pdf
EFTA01106944Dataset 9
2008-07-1119p5,782w
…discover the correspondence now and the court can sort out trial admissibility issues later." [DE 106 at 5]. But as we stated in our initial pleading, when a discovery request seeks information that is subject to exclusion, "many courts shift the burden to the requesting party, requiring them to make a particularized showing that the inadmissible evidence is likely to lead to admissible evidence." Reist v. Source Interlink Co., 2010 WL 4940096 at *2 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 29, 2010)…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01106944.pdf