esc
Search documents
go
Browse entities
go
Corpus stats
go
About the data
go
AI settings
go
EFTA
Search
Search
Entities
About
Stats
Settings
⌘K
search
Search
Search syntax help
Dataset
Set 1
Set 2
Set 3
Set 4
Set 5
Set 6
Set 7
Set 8
Set 9
Set 10
Set 11
Set 12
Sort
Relevance
Most pages
Most words
Dataset
Newest
Oldest
Status
All
Extracted
Failed
DOJ Status
All
Removed
Available
Modified
Date Range
Undated only
–
Email Headers
Page Count
–
Saved Searches
+
65 results for “
"Pyramid Co"
”
Export
Keyboard Shortcuts
/
Focus search
Esc
Blur input
O
Open PDF
←
→
Paginate
EFTA00014649
Dataset 8
2021-11-21
1p
193w
…cannot authenticate Government Exhibit 52 because Mr. , a former employee, purportedly removed the document from the property before Employee-1 began working for Mr. Epstein. The parties are FURTHER ORDERED to file any proposed redactions to the motion papers on the public docket on or before November 22, 2021, justifying any requested redactions by reference to the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v.
Pyramid Co
. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). EFTA00014649
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00014649.pdf
EFTA00010040
Dataset 8
2021-11-12
3p
587w
…order if the exact likeness of those witnesses could be drawn and subsequently publicized in the media. Although courtroom sketch artists might voluntarily elect not to sketch these witness's faces, the Government seeks an order so it can provide certainty to these witnesses in advance of their testimony. ' The Government's proposed redactions are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v.
Pyramid Co
. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006)…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00010040.pdf
EFTA00031708
Dataset 8
2020-12-28
2p
420w
Subject:
RE: Activity in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN USA v. Maxwell Order
From:
'
…Order concurrently filed under temporary seal, the Court DENIES the Defendant's motion. In light of the fact that the Opinion includes potentially confidential information that should not be filed on the public docket, the Court will permit the parties 48 hours to propose any redactions to the Courts Opinion and Order and to justify those redactions by reference tothe Second Circuits decision in Lugosch v.
Pyramid Co
. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110(2d Cir. 2006). After determining which…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00031708.pdf
EFTA00080937
Dataset 9
2019-02-05
3p
925w
…298 (2d Cir. 2012) (internal quotation marks omitted). The Circuit has applied two different approaches when deciding whether the First Amendment right applies to particular material. The "experience-and-logic" approach asks "both whether the documents have historically been open to the press and general public and whether public access plays a significant positive role in the functioning of the particular process in question." Lugosch v.
Pyramid Co
. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 120 (2d Cir. 2006) (internal quotation…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00080937.pdf
EFTA00105946
Dataset 9
2021-10-18
2p
267w
…Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits its motions in limine, which the Government is submitting to the Court under seal by email with proposed redactions. The Government's proposed redactions are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v.
Pyramid Co
. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Although the Government's motions in limine are judicial documents subject to the common law presumption of…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00105946.pdf
EFTA00078636
Dataset 9
2021-11-19
2p
343w
Subject:
[EXTERNAL] FW: Activity in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN USA v. Maxwell Order
From:
[email protected]
<
[email protected]
>
To:
[email protected]
…3) subpoena. That motion has been filed temporarily under seal to allow the parties the opportunity to propose limited redactions. The parties are hereby ORDERED to file any proposed redactions on the public docket on or before November 22, 2021, and to justify any requested redactions by reference to the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v.
Pyramid Co
. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00078636.pdf
EFTA00014896
Dataset 8
2021-11-28
1p
135w
…NATHAN, District Judge: The Court is in receipt of the Government's letter motion to preclude certain lines of cross-examination of Government witnesses. The Court hereby GRANTS the Government's request to file the letter motion under seal in order to protect the privacy interests of anticipated witnesses, including those who are subject to the Court's pseudonym order. See Lugosch v.
Pyramid Co
. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 120 (2d Cir. 2006). The Defendant is hereby ORDERED…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00014896.pdf
EFTA00017095
Dataset 8
2019-08-20
6p
2,238w
…1995). A common law presumption of access attaches to any judicial document, and an additional First Amendment right arises where public access to a document has been historically available (the "experience" prong) and would be valuable to the process in question (the "logic" prong). Lugosch v.
Pyramid Co
. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006). The weight of the common law presumption turns on "the role of the material at issue in the exercise of Article…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00017095.pdf
EFTA00018881
Dataset 8
2021-11-03
2p
250w
…and submitting the unredacted versions to the Court. The redline text in the documents reflect the objections of the defense. Further detail of the parties' objections are contained in comment bubbles. The Government has proposed the only redactions in the Request to Charge. These proposed redactions are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v.
Pyramid Co
. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Although the Government's request to charge is…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00018881.pdf
EFTA00027704
Dataset 8
2021-10-18
2p
267w
…Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits its motions in limine, which the Government is submitting to the Court under seal by email with proposed redactions. The Government's proposed redactions are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v.
Pyramid Co
. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Although the Government's motions in limine are judicial documents subject to the common law presumption of…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00027704.pdf
EFTA00027163
Dataset 8
2021-04-19
2p
270w
…s reply, and the April 19, 2021 joint letter addressing the redactions to these documents. The Government may submit any redaction requests by April 23, 2021; in doing so, the Government shall justify any proposed redactions by reference to the test articulated in Lugosch v.
Pyramid Co
. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). The Defendant, BSF, and the Government are further ORDERED to notify the Court whether any party seeks redactions to the April 19, 2021 joint…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00027163.pdf
EFTA00031598
Dataset 8
2021-02-26
5p
1,518w
…Having considered the parties' respective positions, the Court will grant the Government's requests for redactions and sealing, as well as the Defendant's additional redaction requests, with the exceptions discussed below. To begin with, the Court's reasoning is guided by the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v.
Pyramid Co
. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Under this test, the Court must: (i) determine whether the documents in question are "judicial…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00031598.pdf
EFTA00026705
Dataset 8
2020-08-17
5p
1,611w
…and as a result it will not be sealed. The Court will adopt the redactions to Defendant's August 17, 2020 letter motion that the Government proposed on August 21, 2020, and it will enter that version into the public docket. The Court's decision to adopt the Government's proposed redactions is guided by the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v.
Pyramid Co
. ofOnondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Under this test…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00026705.pdf
EFTA00028055
Dataset 8
2020-08-17
5p
1,572w
…and as a result it will not be sealed. The Court will adopt the redactions to Defendant's August 17, 2020 letter motion that the Government proposed on August 21, 2020, and it will enter that version into the public docket. The Court's decision to adopt the Government's proposed redactions is guided by the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v.
Pyramid Co
. ofOnondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Under this test…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00028055.pdf
EFTA00010037
Dataset 8
2021-11-12
3p
588w
…order if the exact likeness of those witnesses could be drawn and subsequently publicized in the media. Although courtroom sketch artists might voluntarily elect not to sketch these witness's faces, the Government seeks an order so it can provide certainty to these witnesses in advance of their testimony. ' The Government's proposed redactions are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v.
Pyramid Co
. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006)…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00010037.pdf
EFTA00026484
Dataset 8
2021-10-22
3p
640w
…232, 241, 284, 301, 315, the defense did not justify sealing the entirety of the proposed and draft questionnaires and voir dire. See Lugosch v.
Pyramid Co
. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). The Court's planned individual voir dire process is designed to carefully probe the prior exposure to and the potential influence of any pre-trial media. As noted at the conference, the parties may continue to propose for the Court's consideration, any appropriate…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00026484.pdf
EFTA00030910
Dataset 8
2020-11-25
2p
520w
…No. 80. After due consideration, the Court will adopt the Defendant's proposed redactions, which are consented to by the Government. The Court's decision is guided by the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v.
Pyramid Co
. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Under this test, the Court must: (i) determine whether the documents in question are "judicial documents;" (ii) assess the weight of the common law presumption of access to the…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00030910.pdf
EFTA00017823
Dataset 8
2020-11-25
4p
1,443w
…court may later unseal the filing or order the person who made the filing to file a redacted version for the public record." While the Second Circuit has recognized a presumption of access under both common law and the First Amendment, it is appropriate to permit the filing of documents under seal if "countervailing factors" in the common law framework or "higher values" in the First Amendment framework so demand. Lugosch v.
Pyramid Co
. of Onandaga, 435 F.3d 110…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00017823.pdf
EFTA00800210
Dataset 9
2019-03-20
8p
1,634w
…Amodeo, 44 F.3d 141 (2d Cir. 1995) ("Amodeo I"); United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044 (2d Cir. 1995) ("Amodeo II); Lugosch v.
Pyramid Co
, if Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2016) and their progeny. Indeed, proposed Amicus Curiae "admittedly lacks any specific knowledge of the contents of the sealed `Summary Judgment Materials"' (Doc. 153-2, at p. 6) and thus cannot make the requisite factual showing that any of the material should be redacted. HI…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00800210.pdf
EFTA00089737
Dataset 9
2021-05-20
2p
223w
…(Dkt. No. 284). The Government seeks redactions that are narrowly tailored to protect the privacy interests of victims and third parties referenced in the document. These proposed redactions are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v.
Pyramid Co
. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Today the Government is submitting to the Court by email its proposed redactions to Exhibit C, which the Government respectfully requests be filed under seal. EFTA00089737…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00089737.pdf
1–20 of 65 results · page 1 of 4
«
←
1
2
3
4
→
»
Corpus: 1990-03-17 – 2025-12-01
←
November 2021
→
Mo
Tu
We
Th
Fr
Sa
Su
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Undated
(150,429)
None
Light
Medium
Heavy
Results by Dataset
65 total
Set 8
23
Set 9
41
Set 10
1