esc
Search documents
go
Browse entities
go
Corpus stats
go
About the data
go
AI settings
go
EFTA
Search
Search
Entities
About
Stats
Settings
⌘K
search
Search
Search syntax help
Dataset
Set 1
Set 2
Set 3
Set 4
Set 5
Set 6
Set 7
Set 8
Set 9
Set 10
Set 11
Set 12
Sort
Relevance
Most pages
Most words
Dataset
Newest
Oldest
Status
All
Extracted
Failed
DOJ Status
All
Removed
Available
Modified
Date Range
Undated only
–
Email Headers
Page Count
–
Saved Searches
+
72 results for “
"Onondaga"
”
Export
Keyboard Shortcuts
/
Focus search
Esc
Blur input
O
Open PDF
←
→
Paginate
Corpus: 1990-03-17 – 2025-12-01
←
December 2025
→
Mo
Tu
We
Th
Fr
Sa
Su
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Undated
(150,429)
None
Light
Medium
Heavy
EFTA01355605
Dataset 10
1p
229w
…Phone & ZIP code conflict 6. GILBERT, JEFFREY C 405 JAMESVILLE AVE GILBERT. JEFFREY SYRACUSE. NY 13210-3214 (NJ:1963-1964) EPSTEIN. JEFFREY
ONONDAGA
COUNTY (Gender: Male) enil LexID(am):000924045364 (D06: 12/1946) (Age: 66) GILBERT JEFFREY (09/1991-Currunl) 300 THURBER ST SYRACUSE. NY 13210-3623
ONONDAGA
COUNTY (10/1986-10/1986) rn 0 Z 7. EPSTEIN, JEFFREY I 30 WAYSIDE LN EMI C° EPSTEIN SR, JEFFREY I WANTAGH. NY 11793-1307 (NY:1972-1973) Iam )b EPSTEIN, JEFFREY …
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01355605.pdf
EFTA01379173
Dataset 10
1p
148w
…JEFF (091994-Cutrent) KNOX COUNTY 1252009-02/2013) I J (Current Listing Nam) (102002-1112002) NEW YORK COUNTY EPSTEIN JEFF (Current Listing Name) 'Phone & ZIP code contact 6. GILBERT. JEFFREY C GILBERT, JEFFREY (NJ:1963.1964) EPSTEIN. JEFFREY
ONONDAGA
COUNTY (Gent ili 1SISI 09/19 Curtent LexID(sm (DOB (P46: GILBERT JEFFREY (09/I991-Currenl)
ONONDAGA
COUNTY (10.1986-10,1836) z0 cp 7. EPSTEIN. JEFFREY I EPSTEIN SR. JEFFREY I (NY:1972-1973) EPSTEIN, JEFFREY NASSAU COUNTY 00 EPSTEIN…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01379173.pdf
EFTA01381965
Dataset 10
1p
180w
…10010.3125 NEW YORK COUNTY <n1985-03:1492) EPSTEIN JEFF (Current Losing Name) (Phone 8 ZIP code canna 6. GILBERT, JEFFREY C GILBERT. JEFFREY SYRACUSE. NY 132103214 EPSTEIN. JEFFREY (Gender: Male) (DOB: 12/1946) i mmr
ONONDAGA
COUNTY LexID(am):000924045364 (AWE 66) J REY (0911991-Current) SYRACUSE, NY 13210-3623
ONONDAGA
COUNTY (10(1986-10:1886) fn 0 zO 0O cp 7. EPSTEIN, JEFFREY I EPSTEIN SR. JEFFREY I EPSTEIN, JEFFREY WANTAGH. NY 11793-1307 NASSAU COUNTY PIM EPSTEIN…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01381965.pdf
EFTA01372107
Dataset 10
1p
206w
…1806 NASSAU COUNTY 9: 1303E ADAMS ST APT 2 SYRACUSE. NY 13210-2441
ONONDAGA
COUNTY 10: 200E 72ND ST APT 22F NEW YORK, NY 10021-4544 NEW YORK COUNTY 11: 10 L AMBIANCE CT APT L BARDONIA, NY 10954-1400 ROCKLAND COUNTY 12: 18 PECAN VALLEY DR NEW CITY, NY 10956-5544 ROCKLAND COUNTY 13: 400 OCEAN AVE SYRACUSE, NY 13210
ONONDAGA
COUNTY 14: 10 ESQUIRE RD APT NEW CITY, NY 10956-3336 ROCKLAND COUNTY 15: 37 CAROLYN PL BRONXVILLE…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01372107.pdf
EFTA00010040
Dataset 8
2021-11-12
3p
587w
…media. Although courtroom sketch artists might voluntarily elect not to sketch these witness's faces, the Government seeks an order so it can provide certainty to these witnesses in advance of their testimony. ' The Government's proposed redactions are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of
Onondaga
, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Although this letter is a judicial document subject to the common law presumption of access, the…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00010040.pdf
EFTA00031708
Dataset 8
2020-12-28
2p
420w
Subject:
RE: Activity in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN USA v. Maxwell Order
From:
'
…Court DENIES the Defendant's motion. In light of the fact that the Opinion includes potentially confidential information that should not be filed on the public docket, the Court will permit the parties 48 hours to propose any redactions to the Courts Opinion and Order and to justify those redactions by reference tothe Second Circuits decision in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of
Onondaga
, 435 F.3d 110(2d Cir. 2006). After determining which, if any, portions of the Opinion and…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00031708.pdf
EFTA00807062
Dataset 9
2014-05-09
2p
367w
…04-cv-04046-RJS Document 185 Filed 05/09/14 Page 2 of 2 ORDERED THAT Greenberg Traurig's withdrawal as counsel of record does not affect its possession of a charging lien, the monetary value of which will be determined at a later date. Given the presumption in favor of open records applicable to court documents as articulated in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of
Onondaga
, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006), a redacted version of the May 9…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00807062.pdf
EFTA00080937
Dataset 9
2019-02-05
3p
925w
…quotation marks omitted). The Circuit has applied two different approaches when deciding whether the First Amendment right applies to particular material. The "experience-and-logic" approach asks "both whether the documents have historically been open to the press and general public and whether public access plays a significant positive role in the functioning of the particular process in question." Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of
Onondaga
, 435 F.3d 110, 120 (2d Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks omitted). The second approach…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00080937.pdf
EFTA00068499
Dataset 9
2021-11-15
2p
320w
…motion for leave to file a reply on November 22, 2021.1 The moving papers have been filed temporarily under seal to permit the parties the opportunity to propose sealing or limited redactions in accordance with Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of
Onondaga
, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). In two Memorandum Opinions and Orders temporarily filed under seal, the Court GRANTS the Government's motion to preclude as to Dr. Ryan Hall's testimony and GRANTS the Government's…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00068499.pdf
EFTA00087201
Dataset 9
2021-11-15
2p
320w
…motion for leave to file a reply on November 22, 2021.1 The moving papers have been filed temporarily under seal to permit the parties the opportunity to propose sealing or limited redactions in accordance with Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of
Onondaga
, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). In two Memorandum Opinions and Orders temporarily filed under seal, the Court GRANTS the Government's motion to preclude as to Dr. Ryan Hall's testimony and GRANTS the Government's…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00087201.pdf
EFTA00105946
Dataset 9
2021-10-18
2p
267w
…20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits its motions in limine, which the Government is submitting to the Court under seal by email with proposed redactions. The Government's proposed redactions are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of
Onondaga
, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Although the Government's motions in limine are judicial documents subject to the common law presumption of access, the…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00105946.pdf
EFTA00077956
Dataset 9
2021-11-04
2p
267w
…limine, responses in opposition, replies in support, and related exhibits. As the Court indicated at today's conference, some of the parties' proposed redactions are overbroad considering the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of
Onondaga
, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). In particular, for the reasons stated at today's conference, the Court denies the Government's request to redact section ten of the Government's motion in limine. See Dkt…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00077956.pdf
EFTA00078636
Dataset 9
2021-11-19
2p
343w
Subject:
[EXTERNAL] FW: Activity in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN USA v. Maxwell Order
From:
[email protected]
<
[email protected]
>
To:
[email protected]
…redactions. The parties are hereby ORDERED to file any proposed redactions on the public docket on or before November 22, 2021, and to justify any requested redactions by reference to the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of
Onondaga
, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/19/21)(jw) 1:20-cr-00330-AJN-1 Notice has been electronically mailed to: EFTA00078636 David Boies, II…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00078636.pdf
EFTA01428364
Dataset 10
2007-06-18
74p
7,075w
…2002) NEW YORK, NY 10010-3125 NEW YORK COUNTY (03/1985-03/1992) EPSTEIN JEFF (Current Listing Name) Phone & ZIP code conflict (NJ:1966-1967) LexID(sm):000752226968 SSN 6. GILBERT, JEFFREY C GILBERT, JEFFREY EFTA01428373 EPSTEIN, JEFFREY (Gender: Male) (DOB: 12/1946) SYRACUSE, NY 13210-3214
ONONDAGA
COUNTY (09/1991-Current) GILBERT JEFFREY (09/1991-Current) SYRACUSE, NY 13210-3623
ONONDAGA
COUNTY (10/1986-10/1986) 7. EPSTEIN, JEFFREY I EPSTEIN SR, JEFFREY I EPSTEIN, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, JEFF ABR…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01428364.pdf
EFTA00014896
Dataset 8
2021-11-28
1p
135w
…in receipt of the Government's letter motion to preclude certain lines of cross-examination of Government witnesses. The Court hereby GRANTS the Government's request to file the letter motion under seal in order to protect the privacy interests of anticipated witnesses, including those who are subject to the Court's pseudonym order. See Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of
Onondaga
, 435 F.3d 110, 120 (2d Cir. 2006). The Defendant is hereby ORDERED to respond by today, November 28…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00014896.pdf
EFTA00017095
Dataset 8
2019-08-20
6p
2,238w
…additional First Amendment right arises where public access to a document has been historically available (the "experience" prong) and would be valuable to the process in question (the "logic" prong). Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of
Onondaga
, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006). The weight of the common law presumption turns on "the role of the material at issue in the exercise of Article III judicial power" and "the resultant value of such information to those monitoring the…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00017095.pdf
EFTA00018881
Dataset 8
2021-11-03
2p
250w
…the objections of the defense. Further detail of the parties' objections are contained in comment bubbles. The Government has proposed the only redactions in the Request to Charge. These proposed redactions are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of
Onondaga
, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Although the Government's request to charge is a judicial document subject to the common law presumption of access, the proposed redactions are…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00018881.pdf
EFTA00027704
Dataset 8
2021-10-18
2p
267w
…20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits its motions in limine, which the Government is submitting to the Court under seal by email with proposed redactions. The Government's proposed redactions are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of
Onondaga
, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Although the Government's motions in limine are judicial documents subject to the common law presumption of access, the…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00027704.pdf
EFTA00027163
Dataset 8
2021-04-19
2p
270w
…the April 19, 2021 joint letter addressing the redactions to these documents. The Government may submit any redaction requests by April 23, 2021; in doing so, the Government shall justify any proposed redactions by reference to the test articulated in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of
Onondaga
, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). The Defendant, BSF, and the Government are further ORDERED to notify the Court whether any party seeks redactions to the April 19, 2021 joint letter. If not…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00027163.pdf
EFTA00031598
Dataset 8
2021-02-26
5p
1,518w
…Court will grant the Government's requests for redactions and sealing, as well as the Defendant's additional redaction requests, with the exceptions discussed below. To begin with, the Court's reasoning is guided by the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of
Onondaga
, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Under this test, the Court must: (i) determine whether the documents in question are "judicial documents;" (ii) assess the weight of the…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00031598.pdf
1–20 of 72 results · page 1 of 4
«
←
1
2
3
4
→
»
Results by Dataset
72 total
Set 8
20
Set 9
43
Set 10
9