EFTA00029100Dataset 8
2017-04-1334p8,943w
…425 U.S. 484 (1976) 20 In re WinNet R CISC, 2017 WL 1373918 (MM. No. I6MC484(DLC), Apr. 13, 2017) 24 Martindell v. Intl Tel. & Tel. Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979) 18, 21 McNabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 332 (1943) 20 Morales v. Portuondo, 165 F. Supp. 2d 601 2001) 24 Rea v. United States, 350 U.S. 214 (1956) 20 United States v. Bout, 731 F.3d 233 (2d Cir. 2013) 23 United…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00029100.pdf
EFTA00028929Dataset 8
2017-04-1334p8,953w
…425 U.S. 484 (1976) 20 In re WinNet R CISC, 2017 WL 1373918 (S.D.N.Y. No. 16MC484(DLC), Apr. 13, 2017) 24 Martindell v. Intl Tel. & Tel. Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979) 18, 21 McNabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 332 (1943) 20 Morales v. Portuondo, 165 F. Supp. 2d 601 (S.D.N.Y. 2001) 24 Rea v. United States, 350 U.S. 214 (1956) 20 United States v. Bout, 731 F…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00028929.pdf
EFTA00087230Dataset 9
2016-02-2921p6,032w
…that even an inadvertent misstatement to a court requires suppression of evidence obtained as a result. She further seeks an evidentiary hearing to explore whether any misrepresentation by the Government in that hearing was intentional. The Supreme Court has recognized that federal courts have a limited inherent authority to suppress evidence obtained in "willful disobedience of law." United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 727, 735 n.7 (1980) (quoting McNabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 332, 345 (1943))…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00087230.pdf
EFTA00040664Dataset 9
2016-02-2921p6,030w
…that even an inadvertent misstatement to a court requires suppression of evidence obtained as a result. She further seeks an evidentiary hearing to explore whether any misrepresentation by the Government in that hearing was intentional. The Supreme Court has recognized that federal courts have a limited inherent authority to suppress evidence obtained in "willful disobedience of law." United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 727, 735 n.7 (1980) (quoting McNabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 332, 345 (1943))…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00040664.pdf
EFTA00106039Dataset 9
2016-02-2921p6,241w
…that even an inadvertent misstatement to a court requires suppression of evidence obtained as a result. She further seeks an evidentiary hearing to explore whether any misrepresentation by the Government in that hearing was intentional. The Supreme Court has recognized that federal courts have a limited inherent authority to suppress evidence obtained in "willful disobedience of law." United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 727, 735 n.7 (1980) (quoting McNabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 332, 345 (1943))…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00106039.pdf
EFTA00066510Dataset 9
2016-02-2921p6,032w
…that even an inadvertent misstatement to a court requires suppression of evidence obtained as a result. She further seeks an evidentiary hearing to explore whether any misrepresentation by the Government in that hearing was intentional. The Supreme Court has recognized that federal courts have a limited inherent authority to suppress evidence obtained in "willful disobedience of law." United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 727, 735 n.7 (1980) (quoting McNabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 332, 345 (1943))…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00066510.pdf
EFTA00087251Dataset 9
2016-02-2921p6,032w
…that even an inadvertent misstatement to a court requires suppression of evidence obtained as a result. She further seeks an evidentiary hearing to explore whether any misrepresentation by the Government in that hearing was intentional. The Supreme Court has recognized that federal courts have a limited inherent authority to suppress evidence obtained in "willful disobedience of law." United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 727, 735 n.7 (1980) (quoting McNabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 332, 345 (1943))…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00087251.pdf
EFTA00077571Dataset 9
2017-04-1334p9,022w
…425 U.S. 484 (1976) 20 In re WinNet R CISC, 2017 WL 1373918 (S.D.N.Y. No. 16MC484(DLC), Apr. 13, 2017) 24 Martindell v. Intl Tel. & Tel. Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979) 18, 21 McNabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 332 (1943) 20 Morales v. Portuondo, 165 F. Supp. 2d 601 (S.D.N.Y. 2001) 24 Rea v. United States, 350 U.S. 214 (1956) 20 United States v. Bout, 731 F…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00077571.pdf