EFTA00612027Dataset 9
2010-04-3038p8,951w
…law. Turning next to the question of whether there is a reportorial privilege in the Sixth Circuit, the Court finds that there is not. The Sixth Circuit has clearly recognized that reporters do not possess a special privilege against being compelled to testify. In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 810 F.2d 580, 584-85 [13 Med.L.Rptr. 2049) (6th Cir. 1987). Rather, the Court must apply the balancing test established by Rule 26. In re DaimlerChrysler AG Securities Litigation…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00612027.pdf
EFTA00207294Dataset 9
2010-04-3038p10,093w
…law. Turning next to the question of whether there is a reportorial privilege in the Sixth Circuit, the Court finds that there is not. The Sixth Circuit has clearly recognized that reporters do not possess a special privilege against being compelled to testify. In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 810 F.2d 580, 584-85 [13 Med.L.Rptr. 2049) (6th Cir. 1987). Rather, the Court must apply the balancing test established by Rule 26. In re DaimlerChrysler AG Securities Litigation…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00207294.pdf
EFTA01250614Dataset 9
2010-04-3038p10,141w
…law. Turning next to the question of whether there is a reportorial privilege in the Sixth Circuit, the Court finds that there is not. The Sixth Circuit has clearly recognized that reporters do not possess a special privilege against being compelled to testify. In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 810 F.2d 580, 584-85 [13 Med.L.Rptr. 2049] (6th Cir. 1987). Rather, the Court must apply the balancing test established by Rule 26. In re DaimlerChrysler AG Securities litigation…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01250614.pdf
EFTA01199686Dataset 9
51p10,988w
…2d 585, 595 n.20 (Mich. 1981) 18 Goldstein v. Serio, 496 So.2d 412, 414-15 (La.Ct.App.1986) 26 Graham-Eckes Palm Beach Academy v. Johnson, 573 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) 22, 32 Hogen v. Valley Hosp., 147 Cal.App.3d 119, 195 Ca1.Rptr. 5, 7 (1983) 26 Indus. Power & Lighting Corp. v. W. Modular Corp., 623 P.2d 291, 298 (Alaska 1981) 27 Jackson v. BellSouth Telecommunications, 372 F.3d 1250, 1277…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01199686.pdf
EFTA01165659Dataset 9
44p8,425w
…2822 Fred Haddad, E Fred Haddad, One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 Phone: (954)-467-6767 Fax: (954)-467-3599 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein EFTA01165661 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIRST DISTRICT CASE NO. 1D13-5966 MICHAEL L. STEINBERG, Appellant, -vs- MIRIAM F. STEINBERG, Appellee. / INITIAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT On appeal from the Eighth Judicial Circuit in and for Alachua County SIEGAL, HUGHES & ROSS 4046 Newberry Road M. Box 90028 Gainesville…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01165659.pdf
EFTA01100005Dataset 9
2006-07-2643p14,726w
…H.R., to go. J137 was asked twice by H.R. (JD7 Deposition, p.106). "... I just remember the first time I heard about it was H.R. (another high school girl) asking me to go. And then after that, I just remember Jane Doe 4 talking about it and then L.A. (other high school girls). (Id, p. 346, lines 22-25, p. 347). H.R was a grade ahead of 3137 and mentioned it during gym or another…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01100005.pdf
EFTA01199647Dataset 9
2014-02-0639p15,944w
… 587 California -- Hogen v. Valley Hosp., 147 Cal.App.3d 119, 195 Cal.Rptr. 5, 7 (1983) ("... the fact that a communication may be absolutely privileged for the purposes of a defamation action does not prevent its being an element of an action for malicious prosecution in a proper case. The policy of encouraging free access to the courts that underlies the privilege applicable in defamation actions is outweighed by the policy of affording redress for individual wrongs when the…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01199647.pdf
EFTA00610600Dataset 9
2009-07-0822p4,664w
…1477 RICHARD DEBRINCAT and JASON DEBRINCAT, Petitioners, v. STEPHEN FISCHER, Respondent. ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT REPLY BRIEF OF PETITIONERS ON THE MERITS PAUL MORRIS Law Offices of Paul Morris, P.A. Florida Bar No. 193769 Counsel for l'etitioners EFTA00610600 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CITATIONS. ii REPLY ARGUMENT OF PETITIONERS. 1 The Debrincats' Conduct is Within the Litigation Privilege 1 The "Wrong Without a Remedy" Argument. 3 The Tort of…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00610600.pdf
EFTA01112407Dataset 9
2014-01-1637p15,664w
…COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXX/vIBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendant, COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY EDWARDS (EDWARDS), moves this Honorable Court to reconsider the Court's announced intention to grant a summary judgment in favor of the Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN (EPSTEIN), and in support of this motion would show: 1. The…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01112407.pdf
EFTA00797972Dataset 9
2018-11-1510p5,667w
…463 U.S. 277. 103 S. Ct. year) sentences enhanced [187] by habitual felony 3001. 77 L. Ed. 2d 637 for the proposition that his offender statutes for failure to comply with sexual twenty-year sentence constituted cruel and unusual offender registration requirements constitute cruel and punishment.4 unusual punishment. See People v. Nichols. 176 Cal. App. 4th 428, 97 Cal. Rptr. 3d 702, 706 (Cal. Ct. App. In Solem, the defendant was sentenced to life 2009) (holding a sentence…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00797972.pdf
EFTA00596449Dataset 9
2008-08-0836p11,867w
…RECORDING . Motion Seq. No. 1 x DAILY NEWS, L.P.'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR CPLR 3102(e) ORDER TO PRODUCE TAPE RECORDING DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 1633 Broadway — 271h Floor New York, New York 10019 Tel: (212) 489-8230 Fax: (212) 489-8340 DWT 15845345,3 3970112-000042 EFTA00596449 TABLE OF CONTENTS peg PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 STATEMENT OF RELEVANT FACTS 5 A. The Jane Doe Action 5 B. The Unpublished Epstein Interview 6 C. The…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00596449.pdf
EFTA00614418Dataset 9
2009-04-1037p6,240w
…served subpoenas for these records, so I'm not sure why you'd waste time on this part of your motion. As for request #7, I will be happy to supplement this request by attempting to obtain any c*L of insurance cards that she may have for her health insurance. I will also make sure that my MI -Plaintiff provides copies of any "union employment identification cards." With respect to request #17 and #18, much like the Interrogatory you…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00614418.pdf
EFTA00616958Dataset 9
24p4,531w
…2012) 13 Duest v. Dugger, 555 So.2d 849, 852 (Fla. 1990) 13 Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, Barrett & Frappier v. Cole, 748 So.2d 380 (Fla. 2007) 8, 9, 12 Fenelon v. Superior Court, 273 Cal. Rptr. 367, 370-71 (Cal. App. 1990) 5 Ferrell v. State, 29 So.3d 959, 968 n.6 (Fla. 2010) 13 Flatley v. Mauro, 139 P.3rd 2, 16 (Cal. 2006) 5 iii EFTA00616960 Glass v. Parish, 51 So.2d 717 (Fla. 1951) 11 Goldberg…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00616958.pdf
EFTA01085801Dataset 9
2014-02-0639p15,763w
… 587 California -- Hogen v. Valley Hosp., 147 Cal.App.3d 119, 195 Cal.Rptr. 5, 7 (1983) ("... the fact that a communication may be absolutely privileged for the purposes of a defamation action does not prevent its being an element of an action for malicious prosecution in a proper case. The policy of encouraging free access to the courts that underlies the privilege applicable in defamation actions is outweighed by the policy of affording redress for individual wrongs when the…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01085801.pdf
EFTA01106989Dataset 9
51p11,008w
…2d 585, 595 n.20 (Mich. 1981) 18 Goldstein v. Serio, 496 So.2d 412, 414-15 (La.Ct.App.1986) 26 Graham-Eckes Palm Beach Academy v. Johnson, 573 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) 22, 32 Hogen v. Valley Hosp., 147 Cal.App.3d 119, 195 Ca1.Rptr. 5, 7 (1983) 26 Indus. Power & Lighting Corp. v. W. Modular Corp., 623 P.2d 291, 298 (Alaska 1981) 27 Jackson v. BellSouth Telecommunications, 372 F.3d 1250, 1277…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01106989.pdf
EFTA01115564Dataset 9
24p4,534w
…2012) 13 Duest v. Dugger, 555 So.2d 849, 852 (Fla. 1990) 13 Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, Barrett & Frappier v. Cole, 748 So.2d 380 (Fla. 2007) 8, 9, 12 Fenelon v. Superior Court, 273 Cal. Rptr. 367, 370-71 (Cal. App. 1990) 5 Ferrell v. State, 29 So.3d 959, 968 n.6 (Fla. 2010) 13 Flatley v. Mauro, 139 P.3rd 2, 16 (Cal. 2006) 5 iii EFTA01115566 Glass v. Parish, 51 So.2d 717 (Fla. 1951) 11 Goldberg…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01115564.pdf
EFTA01104267Dataset 9
51p10,994w
…2d 585, 595 n.20 (Mich. 1981) 18 Goldstein v. Serio, 496 So.2d 412, 414-15 (La.Ct.App.1986) 26 Graham-Eckes Palm Beach Academy v. Johnson, 573 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) 22, 32 Hogen v. Valley Hosp. 147 Cal.App.3d 119, 195 Cal.Rptr. 5, 7 (1983) 26 Indus. Power & Lighting Corp. v. W. Modular Corp., 623 P.2d 291, 298 (Alaska 1981) 27 Jackson v. BellSouth Telecommunications, 372 F.3d 1250, 1277…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01104267.pdf
EFTA01099943Dataset 9
2006-07-2632p10,791w
…fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Celotex v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 106 S.Q. 2548, 2552, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). Pursuant to Rule 56(b), "a party against whom relief is sought may move, with or without supporting affidavits, for summary judgment on all or part of the claim." As stated by the Supreme Court in Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-323, 106 S.Ct…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01099943.pdf
EFTA00805367Dataset 9
2018-03-0822p7,118w
…on work-product privilege: "[B]ecause Tumelaire's attorney sent the e-mail to the park owner's attorney, any work-product privilege that may have protected it has been waived." Id. at 599. See also Kaplan v. Divosta Homes, L.P., 20 So. 3d 459, 462 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (noting that homeowners' voluntary disclosure of information to their next-door-neighbor's relatives would waive a claim of privilege in confidential matter); Walker v. River City Logistics, Inc.…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00805367.pdf