Epstein Files Search

esc

Search documentsgo
Browse entitiesgo
Corpus statsgo
About the datago
AI settingsgo

EFTASearch

Search Entities About Stats Settings

Dataset

Sort

Status

DOJ Status

Date Range

–

Email Headers

Page Count

–

Corpus: 1990-03-17 – 2025-12-01

September 2020

None

Light

Medium

Heavy

Results by Dataset3 total

Set 8

Set 9

Set 10

3 results for “"Joint Appendix"”

Keyboard Shortcuts

/

Focus search

Esc

Blur input

O

Open PDF

←→

Paginate

EFTA00025378Dataset 8

2020-09-162p227w

Subject: 20-3061 United States of America v. Maxwell "So-Ordered Scheduling Notification FILED"

From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>

…Name: United States of America v. Maxwell Case Number: 20-3061 Document(s): Document(al Docket Text: SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell Brief due date as 10/22/2020. Joint Appendix due date as 10/22/2020, FILED.[2932112] [20-3061] Notice will be electronically mailed to: T Gee, Laura Menninger, am • ue er, Gerard Whidbee, Deputy Clerk: Notice will be stored in the notice cart for: Gerard Whidbee, Deputy Clerk Quality Control 1 The following document…

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00025378.pdf

EFTA01358959Dataset 10

1p576w

…we resolve with this opinon three separate appeals. Our citations to the respective records will begin with the relevant docket number on appeal, and references to "JA" are to the respective joint appendices filed with that appeal. For example. our citation to '15-1771 JA 296-881 is to pages 286-88 of the joint appendix filed in the appeal brought by U.S. Bark docketed No. 15-1771. Subordinated Notes. In 2006, MPM issued $500 million in subordinated unsecured…

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01358959.pdf

EFTA00791869Dataset 9

2019-03-1527p6,343w

…Page3 of 27 Introduction The panel's Order to Show Cause and March 13 Order directing the appellees to produce the sealed and redacted summary judgment papers that were not part of the joint appendix suggest the panel intends to supplant the district court in determining whether the summary-judgment papers should be unsealed. We respectfully submit that the panel is acting well outside and contrary to the Supreme Court and this Court's own precedents. The question before the…

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00791869.pdf