esc
Search documents
go
Browse entities
go
Corpus stats
go
About the data
go
AI settings
go
EFTA
Search
Search
Entities
About
Stats
Settings
⌘K
search
Search
Search syntax help
Dataset
Set 1
Set 2
Set 3
Set 4
Set 5
Set 6
Set 7
Set 8
Set 9
Set 10
Set 11
Set 12
Sort
Relevance
Most pages
Most words
Dataset
Newest
Oldest
Status
All
Extracted
Failed
DOJ Status
All
Removed
Available
Modified
Date Range
Undated only
–
Email Headers
Page Count
–
Saved Searches
+
4,901 results for “
"Jane"
”
Export
Keyboard Shortcuts
/
Focus search
Esc
Blur input
O
Open PDF
←
→
Paginate
Corpus: 1990-03-17 – 2025-12-01
←
June 2013
→
Mo
Tu
We
Th
Fr
Sa
Su
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Undated
(150,429)
None
Light
Medium
Heavy
EFTA00209801
Dataset 9
2013-06-25
1p
75w
Subject:
FW:
Jane
Does #1 and #2
Subject: FW:
Jane
Does #1 and #2 Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 23:38:11 +0000 Importance: Normal FYI - Sent: Tuesda June 25 2013 4:00 PM u ject: ane oes l an end -have conferred and will confer tomorrow with i. a requests that we no file anything until she gets back to me tomorrow. I'm pretty sure you weren't going to file anything, yet, but wanted to pass this request on to you. Thanks, EFTA00209801
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00209801.pdf
EFTA00211717
Dataset 9
2017-06-02
1p
52w
Subject:
Jane
Does - Response and Cross-Motion
From: To: Cc: Subject:
Jane
Does - Response and Cross-Motion Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 20:07:52 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: Resp._and_Opp._to_Motionjor_Partial_SLand_Cross-Motionfor_SJ.docx Here is the response and cross-motion with all edits incorporated. I am going to proofread it once more, but I think it otherwise just needs your final review and approval. EFTA00211717
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00211717.pdf
EFTA01660400
Dataset 10
2014-07-18
1p
265w
Subject:
Jane
doe 102
To:
'
From: To: ' Subject:
Jane
doe 102 Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 19:15:50 +0000 Importance: Normal Hi Still ploughing through the case and going to places w this I never dreamed but all is good. I hate to bother you about the past but I remember you saying you we're familiar w the Ron Eppinger case and knew someone from the inside that personally was there at the time. I'm not going after Eppinger or anything like…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01660400.pdf
EFTA01990468
Dataset 10
2010-04-14
1p
27w
Subject:
Jane
Doe Nos. 2 - 8 v. Epstein
From:
David A. Yarema Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 5:30 PM To: Robert D. Critton Jr.
From: David A. Yarema Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 5:30 PM To: Robert D. Critton Jr. Subject:
Jane
Doe Nos. 2 - 8 v. Epstein EFTA_R1_00483094 EFTA01990468
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01990468.pdf
EFTA01660364
Dataset 10
2010-07-01
2p
551w
Subject:
RE:
Jane
Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein
From: To: Cc: Subject: RE:
Jane
Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 18:37:35 +0000 Importance: Normal That is correct. We are still investigating and the investigation is currently active. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 From: Sent: Thursday. July 01 2010 2:36 PM To: Cc: Subject: RE:
Jane
Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein Importance: High Dexter, The FD515 is an accomplishment report. I spoke with SA…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01660364.pdf
EFTA02436374
Dataset 11
2009-09-02
1p
15w
Subject:
Jane
McGonigal
To:
Jeffrey Epsteingeevacation©gmail.com]
To: Jeffrey Epsteingeevacation©gmail.com] From: Sent Wed 9/2/2009 9:50:22 PM Subject:
Jane
McGonigal http://www.avantgame.com/ EFTA_R1_01508852 EFTA02436374
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02436374.pdf
EFTA00030341
Dataset 8
2020-06-30
2p
598w
Subject:
RE: Request for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy Request);
Jane
Doe v. Indyke et al.,
From: To: Subject: RE: Request for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy Request);
Jane
Doe v. Indyke et al., SDNY Case No. I :20-cv-00484-JGK-DCF Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 20:25:32 +0000 No problem! Good luck with everything. I don't think there's any hard deadline on the request because we're not in court and they didn't send a subpoena. So the main constraint is Glassman's annoyance. I wrote him a brief…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00030341.pdf
EFTA00084175
Dataset 9
2020-07-24
4p
991w
Subject:
RE: Request for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy Request);
Jane
Doe v. Indyke et al.,
From:
r
To:
'' , (USANYS)" ctl
From: r To: '' , (USANYS)" ctl Cc: Subject: RE: Request for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy Request);
Jane
Doe v. Indyke et al., SDNY Case No. 1:20-cv-00484-JGK-DCF Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 23:12:26 +0000 1=, Thanks very much, and this generally looks fine to me. Might it be possible to add the following before the "Please contact me" sentence: And the materials that emailed at 3:06 this afternoon all look good to me…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00084175.pdf
EFTA00205419
Dataset 9
2012-01-23
1p
215w
Subject:
Jane
Doe Case
Subject:
Jane
Doe Case Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:17:50 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: DE48-3_201 ictim_notification_Ittpdf; DE48- 4 20110321 icti n_ltr.pdf; DE48- 6 20110321 f• DE48- 7 20110321 forSpdf; DE48- 8 20110321 302 of from Jan 2008.pdf; DE48 20110321_Motn_for_finding_a_violation_of_CVRA.pdf; DE48- 2 20110321=M302.pdf Hi Ed - FINALLY, I found it. Now I know why the court wants us to make our documents searchable. See…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00205419.pdf
EFTA00211565
Dataset 9
2016-03-23
1p
55w
Subject:
Jane
Doe Case -- Order re Settlement Conf
From:
(USAFLS)" </O=
To:
mom (USAFLS)" (USAFLS)"
From: (USAFLS)" </O= To: mom (USAFLS)" (USAFLS)" (USAFLS)" USAFLS)" Subject:
Jane
Doe Case -- Order re Settlement Conf Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 15:08:21 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: DE374_20160323_Order_of_Ref_tojudge_Brannon_for_Settlement_Conf.pdf This just arrived. I am going to call chambers to find out availability for beginning of May. Assistant U.S. Attorney West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00211565
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00211565.pdf
EFTA00209794
Dataset 9
2013-07-15
1p
72w
Subject:
Re:
Jane
Does I USA
Subject: Re:
Jane
Does I USA Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 00:24:03 +0000 Importance: Normal I'm assuming it was October 26, 2007 for #1 and after June 2008 for #2, correct? Any other discussions with #1 before July 2008? On Jul 14, 2013, at 8:10 PM, > When did the FBI agents inform
Jane
Doe #1 about NPA? Was it before July 2008? Was
Jane
Doe #2 informed before July 2008? EFTA00209794
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00209794.pdf
EFTA00208157
Dataset 9
2011-12-06
1p
93w
Subject:
Jane
Does Responses
To:
MINIIJSA r USAFLS "
…USAFLS " USAFLS)" Subject:
Jane
Does Responses Date: The, 06 Dec 2011 01:56:30 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: DE127_20111205Jane_Does_Resp_to_Motn_to Dismiss.pdf; DE130_20111205Jane_Does_Motn to_Compel tdf; DE129_20111205Jane_Does_Resp3o_Motn to_Stay_Discovery.pdf; DE128_20111205Jane_Does_Protective_Mam_for_Remedies.pdf Hi everyone: Here are the responses of the
Jane
Does. If they filed anything under seal I haven't received it. «DE127_20111205_
Jane
Does Resp to Moth to…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00208157.pdf
EFTA00211811
Dataset 9
2008-10-16
3p
791w
Subject:
RE: Reply Brief in
Jane
Does I United States
From:
Jay Lefkowitz
To:
Jay Lefkowitz
From: To: Jay Lefkowitz Subject: RE: Reply Brief in
Jane
Does I United States Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:25:56 +0000 Importance: Normal She has an amazing voice -- I saw her in Sweeney Todd. There are so many great shows playing right now. I hope that the economy doesn't destroy Broadway. Have a good time. If you are going to file anything in the Doe I. United States case, just give me a heads up. Thanks. Assistant…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00211811.pdf
EFTA00211378
Dataset 9
2016-06-06
1p
41w
Subject:
Jane
Doe Update?
Subject:
Jane
Doe Update? Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 18:53:38 +0000 Importance: Normal Any luck with the NAC? And have you had a chance to review the proposed settlement agreement and draft a stipulation of dismissal to include? Thank you! EFTA00211378
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00211378.pdf
EFTA00205287
Dataset 9
2013-06-20
1p
76w
Subject:
Jane
Does U.S., aka Epstein
Subject:
Jane
Does U.S., aka Epstein Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 14:15:54 +0000 Importance: Normal Hi Ed and Rolando: Judge Marra just issued a series of orders ruling against the US in the victims' suit arising out of the Epstein case. He denied the motion to dismiss and the motion to stay discovery. Do you want to participate in the discussions about what to do next? We have some short deadlines for unsealing some matters. EFTA00205287
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00205287.pdf
EFTA00215418
Dataset 9
2008-07-21
2p
157w
Subject:
RE: Letter from counsel for
Jane
Does
…RE: Letter from counsel for
Jane
Does Date: Mon, 21Jul 2008 20:29:25 +0000 Importance: Normal Do you want to give me a call? From: Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 4:26 PM To: Cc: Subject: RE: Letter from counsel for
Jane
Does I have the letter. Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 4:13 PM To: Cc: Subject: Letter from counsel for
Jane
Does Hi — I just received a letter from Brad Edwards. counsel for the two
Jane
Does…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00215418.pdf
EFTA00204922
Dataset 9
2011-12-08
2p
364w
Subject:
RE:
Jane
Does 1 US -- Sealed Response to Motion to Dismiss
…Subject: RE:
Jane
Does US -- Sealed Response to Motion to Dismiss Let's do it tomorrow. I will have my Blackberry on. I believe our replies are due on December 15. I am set to go to trial before Judge Ungaro during the two week term commencing January 16, 2012. She just denied my motion for continuance, so it looks like the case is going forward. Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 4:02 PM Subject: Re:
Jane
Does I US…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00204922.pdf
EFTA00100560
Dataset 9
2019-02-05
1p
172w
Subject:
Automatic reply: legal process, in re
Jane
Doe 43 v. Epstein, et al., 17 Civ. 0616
From:
Peter Skinner
To:
'SI
From: Peter Skinner To: 'SI Subject: Automatic reply: legal process, in re
Jane
Doe 43 v. Epstein, et al., 17 Civ. 0616 Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 18:23:46 +0000 I am traveling and may be delayed in responding to your email. If this is an emergency, please contact Josephine Demonaco The information contained in this electronic message is confidential information intended only for the use of the named recipients) and may contain information that. among other protections, is…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00100560.pdf
EFTA00205860
Dataset 9
2011-09-16
1p
57w
Subject:
Jane
Does v. United States, 08-80736-CIV-Marra/Johnson
From:
(USAFLS)" alMIN>
To:
ala>
From: (USAFLS)" alMIN> To: ala> Subject:
Jane
Does v. United States, 08-80736-CIV-Marra/Johnson Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:41:37 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: Proposed_Order on_Motn_for_Extension_of Time.wpd <<Proposed Order on Motn for Extension of Time.vvpd>> Good afternoon -- Attached please find the proposed Order on the Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. Thank you. Assistant U.S. Attorney Fax EFTA00205860
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00205860.pdf
EFTA00207231
Dataset 9
2010-04-13
1p
53w
Subject:
Jane
Doe Reply re FBI Subpoena.pdf
From:
(USAFLS)" alMIN>
To:
(USAFLS)" alMIE>
From: (USAFLS)" alMIN> To: (USAFLS)" alMIE> Subject:
Jane
Doe Reply re FBI Subpoena.pdf Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:52:32 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments:
Jane
_Doe_Reply_re_FBI_Subpoena.pdf Hi Dexter — This just came via CMIECF. Has anyone told the plaintiffs that we don't have anything responsive to their subpoena? <<Jane Doe Reply re FBI Subpoena.pdf>> EFTA00207231
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00207231.pdf
1–20 of 4,901 results · page 1 of 246
«
←
1
2
…
246
→
»
Results by Dataset
4,901 total
Set 7
2
Set 8
145
Set 9
3,842
Set 10
721
Set 11
187
Set 12
4