Epstein Files Search

EFTA00013801Dataset 8

2008-05-1910p3,525w

…commitment to take no position regarding potential claims of government witnesses. See Tab 39, November 28, 2008 Email from I. Lefkowitz to I. o The letter cited to an inapplicable statute (the Justice for All Act of 2004) as its justification for being sent. Id. AUSA Acosta later conceded that the citation to this statute as a justification was wholly incorrect. o The letter wrongly advised all recipients that Mr. Epstein would be required to register as "a sexual predator…

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00013801.pdf

EFTA00210053Dataset 9

2008-05-1910p3,519w

…commitment to take no position regarding potential claims of government witnesses. See Tab 39, November 28, 2008 Email from J. Lefkowitz to a. o The letter cited to an inapplicable statute (the Justice for All Act of 2004) as its justification for being sent. Id. AUSA Acosta later conceded that the citation to this statute as a justification was wholly incorrect. o The letter wrongly advised all recipients that Mr. Epstein would be required to register as "a sexual predator…

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00210053.pdf

EFTA00224814Dataset 9

2008-05-1910p3,565w

…See Tab 39, November 28, 2008 Email from J. Lefkowitz to J. =. o The letter cited to an inapplicable statute (the Justice for All Act of 2004) as its justification for being sent. Id. AUSA Acosta later conceded that the citation to this statute as a justification was wholly incorrect. o The letter wrongly advised all recipients that Mr. Epstein would be required to register as "a sexualpredator for the remainder of this life." o The letter amounted to…

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00224814.pdf

EFTA00808436Dataset 9

2018-11-2819p3,984w

…and consequently the substitute service attempt was void as a matter of law, due process requires this Court's reversal of the order asserting personal jurisdiction over Epstein based on that defective substitute service attempt. II. Plaintiffs' Untimely Request for an Evidentiary Hearing to Comply with an Inapplicable Statute is Unpreserved, Unpersuasive, and Must be Rejected Plaintiffs ask this Court for remand and an evidentiary hearing that they never requested below in an effort to cure fatal defects in their…

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00808436.pdf

EFTA00067343Dataset 9

2008-05-1910p3,532w

…commitment to take no position regarding potential claims of government witnesses. See Tab 39, November 28, 2008 Email from J. Lefkowitz to a. o The letter cited to an inapplicable statute (the Justice for All Act of 2004) as its justification for being sent. Id. AUSA Acosta later conceded that the citation to this statute as a justification was wholly incorrect. o The letter wrongly advised all recipients that Mr. Epstein would be required to register as "a sexual predator…

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00067343.pdf