esc
Search documents
go
Browse entities
go
Corpus stats
go
About the data
go
AI settings
go
EFTA
Search
Search
Entities
About
Stats
Settings
⌘K
search
Search
Search syntax help
Dataset
Set 1
Set 2
Set 3
Set 4
Set 5
Set 6
Set 7
Set 8
Set 9
Set 10
Set 11
Set 12
Sort
Relevance
Most pages
Most words
Dataset
Newest
Oldest
Status
All
Extracted
Failed
DOJ Status
All
Removed
Available
Modified
Date Range
Undated only
–
Email Headers
Page Count
–
Saved Searches
+
1,119 results for “
"INTERVENE"
”
Export
Keyboard Shortcuts
/
Focus search
Esc
Blur input
O
Open PDF
←
→
Paginate
EFTA00209559
Dataset 9
2013-07-11
2p
522w
Subject:
RE: motion to
intervene
From:
Paul Cassell
From: Paul Cassell To: "Maria Kelljchian , Jackie Perczek Subject: RE: motion to
intervene
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 21:51:32 +0000 Importance: Normal Hi Jackie, Brad and I no longer think we need to conference on this, as we have figured out how to proceed — we won't raise any objection to a lack of conference. Thanks for getting back to us so quickly. Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards for Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00209559.pdf
EFTA00207927
Dataset 9
2011-04-13
2p
485w
Subject:
RE: Motion to
Intervene
- extension of time
From:
Paul Cassell <I
To:
Jackie Perczek
From: Paul Cassell <I To: Jackie Perczek SAFLS)" (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Motion to
Intervene
- extension of time Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 17:33:44 +0000 Importance: Normal Thanks! Paul Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, the person responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00207927.pdf
EFTA00212743
Dataset 9
2011-04-13
2p
364w
Subject:
Re: Motion to
Intervene
- extension of time
From:
Paul Cassel
From: To: Subject: Re: Motion to
Intervene
- extension of time Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:46:57 +0000 Importance: Normal Hi Paul, No problem. We have no objection. Mess From: Paul Cassel To: To: To: To: To: Sent: 4/13/2011 12:25:48 PM Subject: RE: Motion to
Intervene
- extension of time We have just filed a motion for extension of time to May 2 to respond to the 85 pages of government pleadings in the Epstein matter…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00212743.pdf
EFTA00207816
Dataset 9
2011-04-13
2p
397w
Subject:
Re: Motion to
Intervene
- extension of time
From:
Jackie Perczek
To:
Jackie Perczek
…USAFLS)" (USAFLS)" Subject: Re: Motion to
Intervene
- extension of time Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:46:57 +0000 Importance: Normal Hi Paul, No problem. We have no objection. Jackie ----Original Message-- From: Paul Oitcell To: Jackie Perczek To: To: To: To: aln Sent: 4/13/2011 12:25:48 PM Subject: RE: Motion to
Intervene
- extension of time Hi Jackie, We have just filed a motion for extension of time to May 2 to respond to the 85 pages…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00207816.pdf
EFTA02181886
Dataset 10
2011-10-14
1p
42w
Subject:
Alarm - reminder: Epstein's reply in support of motion to
intervene
due Oct 14
To: From: Sent: Mon 10/17/2011 1:39:48 PM Subject: Alarm - reminder: Epstein's reply in support of motion to
intervene
due Oct 14 October 14, 2011 7:00 AM : reminder: Epstein's reply in support of motion to
intervene
due Oct 14 EFTA_R1_00872614 EFTA02181886
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA02181886.pdf
EFTA02181735
Dataset 10
2011-10-14
1p
42w
Subject:
Alarm - reminder: Epstein's reply in support of motion to
intervene
due Oct 14
To: From: Sent: Wed 10/19/2011 3:26:37 PM Subject: Alarm - reminder: Epstein's reply in support of motion to
intervene
due Oct 14 October 14, 2011 7:00 AM : reminder: Epstein's reply in support of motion to
intervene
due Oct 14 EFTA_R1_00872349 EFTA02181735
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA02181735.pdf
EFTA00205026
Dataset 9
2011-05-10
1p
277w
Subject:
Conversation with Cassell and Edwards - Bruce Reinhart's Motion to
Intervene
/Sanctions
From:
" (USAFLS)" </O=USA/OU=FLS/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DLEE>
To:
" . (USAFLS)" < , ( USAFLS)"
…< , ( USAFLS)" < > Cc: " . (USAFLS)" < (USAFLS)" Subject: Conversation with Cassell and Edwards - Bruce Reinhart's Motion to
Intervene
/Sanctions Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 20:38:57 +0000 Importance: Normal and M, I just spoke with Cassell and Edwards about their upcoming response to Bruce Reinhart's motion to
intervene
and motion for sanctions. Cassell had previously written to OPR seeking access to information to respond to the motion for sanctions. I told at OPR to refer Cassell…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00205026.pdf
EFTA00016130
Dataset 8
2019-08-02
2p
249w
Subject:
RE: US v. Gatto - Oath Inc. Motion to
Intervene
To:
Albano, Jonathan M ; Peng, Victoria ; Steve
Fron Ti C Subject: RE: US v. Gatto - Oath Inc. Motion to
Intervene
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 15:22:13 +0000 Attachments: Brown v Maxwell.doc Dear Counsel: Would you please let me know if you have any objection to my filing with the Court a copy of the attached decision of the Second Circuit in Brown v. Maxwell (July 3, 2019)? Thank you, and have a good weekend. Jon Jonathan M. Albano Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 10-1726…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00016130.pdf
EFTA01102347
Dataset 9
2011-11-04
5p
1,183w
…FEES - READ RESEARCH MATERIALS FOR REPLY. 1.50 862.50 10/03/2011 RB LEGAL FEES - TELEPHONE CALL WITH AUSA VILLIFANA; RE-READ HER LATEST FILING. 1.80 2,520.00 JP LEGAL FEES - RESEARCH AND WORK ON REPLY TO MOTION TO
INTERVENE
: E-MAILS WITH RB CONCERNING REID WEINGARTEN. 6.10 3,507.50 P/L PARALEGAL FEES - WORK RE: CASE LAW FROM WESTLAW FOR JP REVIEW; WORK RE: SEVERAL DOCKET ENTRIES FOR CASE 08-CV-80893 FOR JP. …
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01102347.pdf
EFTA00621473
Dataset 9
2011-04-05
4p
807w
…VARIOUS IN-OFFICE MEETINGS WITH TO DISCUSS STRATEGY; CONFERENCE WITH JFN CONCERNING INTERVENTION AND WAIVER RESEARCH. 8.30 4,772.50 KP LEGAL FEES - WESTLAW RESEARCH; REVIEW NUMEROUS CASES; E-MAILS. 4.00 1,540.00 JFN LEGAL FEES - CONFERENCE CALL WITH JP; RESEARCH WAIVER/
INTERVENE
. 2.70 1,269.00 JAS LEGAL FEES - RESEARCH RE: CVRA, JOINDER, INDISPENSABLE PARTY. 6.10 2,074.00 Page 2 EFTA00621474 Statement Date: 04/05/2011 Statement No. 60 JEFFREY EPSTEIN Account No. …
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00621473.pdf
EFTA00208164
Dataset 9
2012-01-06
2p
527w
Subject:
Status of Outstanding Motions/Discovery issue
From:
(USAFLS)" alMIN>
To:
NIEliSAFLSr alMIE>, (USAFLS)"
…2012 17:36:39 +0000 Importance: Normal Hi IN and There are several motions that are fully briefed but have not been decided: DE50: Petitioners' Motion for an Order Directing the U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence (this was "held in abeyance" while the Court ordered "limited discovery"). DE51: Petitioners' Motion to Use Correspondence to Provide Violations of the CVRA and to Have their Unredacted Pleadings Unsealed. DE56: Motion to
Intervene
by Roy Black, Martin Weinberg…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00208164.pdf
EFTA00208552
Dataset 9
2011-04-07
1p
189w
Subject:
Emailing: Response re Moth to Unseal final.wpd
…00 has passed me by. Do you think I need to send the exhibits to Epstein's folks? I don't think the Court has ruled on the Motions to
Intervene
yet. I am going to finish the other Response right now, then go back to the redaction project. The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments: Response re Motn to Unseal final.wpd Note: To protect against computer viruses, e-mail programs may…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00208552.pdf
EFTA00209263
Dataset 9
2013-07-26
1p
154w
Subject:
US v. Doe
From:
Jackie Perczek
From: Jackie Perczek Cc: Marti Weinberg , Roy Black < Subject: US v. Doe Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 15:48:11 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments:
Intervene
--Jeffrey--_RE_6(e)4.pdf Inline-Images: image00 ljpg; image002.jpg; image003.jpg Attached is a motion to
intervene
by Jeffrey Epstein to protect his 6(e) rights. Please let me know if the government objects. Thanks, Jackie Perczek, Esq. BLACK SPEBNICK www.royblackcom KOPNSPAN Black Srebnick Kornspan & Stumpf, PA STUMPF 201 S…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00209263.pdf
EFTA00205039
Dataset 9
2011-04-20
35p
14,311w
…Department of Justice violated Plaintiff's rights under the Crime Victims Rights Act, Plaintiffs make irrelevant and gratuitous accusations that Movant violated unspecified Florida Bar rules and Department of Justice regulations. Movant should be granted leave to
intervene
to rebut these false allegations, and to seek sanctions. Alternatively, the Court on its own initiative should require Plaintiffs and their counsel to show their compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. Without any attempt to tie the allegations to the…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00205039.pdf
EFTA00583886
Dataset 9
2013-07-26
4p
1,444w
…DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S RESPONSE TO MOTION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN FOR LIMITED INTERVENTION In their Response, plaintiffs first contend that Mr. Epstein's limited motion to
intervene
is not timely because they first filed their discovery requests more than a year and a half ago. Response at 3-4. That date is wholly irrelevant for purposes of evaluating the timeliness of Mr. Epstein's motion, as there has been no prior litigation whatsoever on the specific question…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00583886.pdf
EFTA00921021
Dataset 9
2011-09-26
3p
545w
Subject:
Re: Activity in Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Doe v. United States of America Order on Motion for
From:
jeffrey epstein <
[email protected]
>
To:
Martin Weinberg
From: jeffrey epstein <jeevacation®gmail.com> To: Martin Weinberg Subject: Re: Activity in Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Doe v. United States of America Order on Motion for Summary Judgment Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:48:19 +0000 It says deny motion to
intervene
? Sony for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone On Sep 26, 2011, at 5:26 PM, Martin Weinberg c > wrote: Judge Marra decided that CVRA does apply to pre-indictment investigations. He rejects…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00921021.pdf
EFTA00223026
Dataset 9
2p
441w
…seal this Motion, the United States' Motion of Jeffrey Epstein to
Intervene
and to Quash Grand Jury Subpoenas and Cross-Motion to Compel , the United States' Motion for Permission to File Ex Pane Affidavits, the Order on the United States' Motion for Permission to File Ex Parte Affidavits, the United States' Unopposed Motion for Permission to File Oversized Response to Motion of Jeffrey Epstein to
Intervene
and to Quash Grand Jury Subpoenas and Cross-Motion to Compel, Ex Parte Declaration…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00223026.pdf
EFTA00077311
Dataset 9
2020-02-11
14p
4,323w
…The EFTA00077311 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1111 Filed 09/01/20 Page 2 of 14 Court therefore should grant the USVI's motion and enter an order allowing the USVI to
intervene
as of right or by leave and to obtain confidential access to all sealed documents relating to the parties' motions for summary judgment and all unified deposition transcripts and exhibits thereto for use in its pending law enforcement action against the Epstein Estate. BACKGOUND Under…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00077311.pdf
EFTA00207976
Dataset 9
2011-05-02
8p
2,184w
…Ins. Co.l Sandy Lake Properties, Inc., 425 F.3d 1308 (11th Cir. 2005). The The defense attorneys have not claimed that they should be permitted to
intervene
under Rule 24(b) dealing with permissive intervention. Indeed, they have not even cited that rule. Accordingly, the victims have not discussed permissive intervention. 2 EFTA00207977 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 78 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/02/2011 Page 3 of 8 defense attorneys have no "direct, substantial, and…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00207976.pdf
EFTA00795274
Dataset 9
2011-05-16
8p
1,883w
… Here, there is no indication that the Justice Department will do anything other than vigorously defend the non-prosecution agreement that it negotiated. The Court need not allow another third-party to try undercut the victims as well. Reinhart attempts to manufacture an interest by alleging that he is entitled to
intervene
to contest two factual allegations made by the victims that relate to him and seek Rule 11 sanctions for the allegations. But as a non-party, he lacks…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00795274.pdf
1–20 of 1,119 results · page 1 of 56
«
←
1
2
…
56
→
»
Corpus: 1990-03-17 – 2025-12-01
←
July 2013
→
Mo
Tu
We
Th
Fr
Sa
Su
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Undated
(150,429)
None
Light
Medium
Heavy
Results by Dataset
1,119 total
Set 7
1
Set 8
32
Set 9
833
Set 10
182
Set 11
71