Epstein Files Search

EFTA00011452Dataset 8

2017-06-3023p6,031w

…12, 2017) 17 Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41 (2d Ck 2019) 3, 6 Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 510 U.S. 32 (1991) 17 Chemical Bank v. Affiliated FM Ins. Co., 154 F.R.D. 91 (S.D.N.Y. 1994) passim Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978) 18 Giglio v. U.S., 405 U.S. 150 (1972) 16 v. Maxwell, 325 F. Supp. 3d 428 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) 6 Klein v. Weidner, Civ. No…

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00011452.pdf

EFTA00029077Dataset 8

2017-06-3023p5,979w

…12, 2017) 17 Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41 (2d Ck 2019) 3, 6 Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 510 U.S. 32 (1991) 17 Chemical Bank v. Affiliated FM Ins. Co., 154 F.R.D. 91 (S.D.N.Y. 1994) passim Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978) 18 Giglio v. U.S., 405 U.S. 150 (1972) 16 v. Maxwell, 325 F. Supp. 3d 428 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) 6 Klein v. Weidner, Civ. No…

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00029077.pdf

EFTA00029100Dataset 8

2017-04-1334p8,943w

…FM Ins. Co., 154 F.R.D. 91 1994) 14, 18, 19 Elkins v. United States, 364 U.S. 206 (1960) 20 Four Star Fin. Servs., LLC v. Commonwealth Mgmt. Assocs., 166 F. Supp. 2d 805 2001) 25 Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978) 20, 22 v. Maxwell, 325 F. Supp. 3d 428 (. 2018) 8, 15 Hampton v. United States, 425 U.S. 484 (1976) 20 In re WinNet R CISC, 2017 WL 1373918 (MM. No. I6MC484(DLC…

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00029100.pdf

EFTA00028929Dataset 8

2017-04-1334p8,953w

…1994) 14, 18, 19 Elkins v. United States, 364 U.S. 206 (1960) 20 Four Star Fin. Servs., LLC v. Commonwealth Mgmt. Assocs., 166 F. Supp. 2d 805 (S.D.N.Y. 2001) 25 Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978) 20, 22 v. Maxwell, 325 F. Supp. 3d 428 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) 8, 15 Hampton v. United States, 425 U.S. 484 (1976) 20 In re WinNet R CISC, 2017 WL 1373918 (S.D.N.Y…

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00028929.pdf

EFTA00029816Dataset 8

2017-06-3023p5,973w

…12, 2017) 17 Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41 (2d Ck 2019) 3, 6 Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 510 U.S. 32 (1991) 17 Chemical Bank v. Affiliated FM Ins. Co., 154 F.R.D. 91 (S.D.N.Y. 1994) passim Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978) 18 Giglio v. U.S., 405 U.S. 150 (1972) 16 v. Maxwell, 325 F. Supp. 3d 428 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) 6 Klein v. Weidner, Civ. No…

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00029816.pdf

EFTA00086658Dataset 9

2017-06-3023p6,016w

…12, 2017) 17 Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41 (2d Ck 2019) 3, 6 Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 510 U.S. 32 (1991) 17 Chemical Bank v. Affiliated FM Ins. Co., 154 F.R.D. 91 (S.D.N.Y. 1994) passim Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978) 18 Giglio v. U.S., 405 U.S. 150 (1972) 16 Maxwell, 325 F. Supp. 3d 428 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) 6 Klein v. Weidner, Civ. No. 08…

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00086658.pdf

EFTA00077571Dataset 9

2017-04-1334p9,022w

…1994) 14, 18, 19 Elkins v. United States, 364 U.S. 206 (1960) 20 Four Star Fin. Servs., LLC v. Commonwealth Mgmt. Assocs., 166 F. Supp. 2d 805 (S.D.N.Y. 2001) 25 Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978) 20, 22 v. Maxwell, 325 F. Supp. 3d 428 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) 8, 15 Hampton v. United States, 425 U.S. 484 (1976) 20 In re WinNet R CISC, 2017 WL 1373918 (S.D.N.Y…

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00077571.pdf

EFTA00013785Dataset 8

2008-06-1914p7,725w

…like how old are you. And then I was like 18. But I kind of said it really fast because I didn't want to make it sound like I was lying or anything. Tr. at 38-39. Thus, consistent with the guidance provided in Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978), the search warrant affidavit in this case reveals knowing and reckless falsehoods and omitted material information. This is precisely the type the United States Supreme Court sought…

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00013785.pdf

EFTA00210039Dataset 9

2008-06-1914p7,715w

…like how old are you. And then I was like 18. But I kind of said it really fast because I didn't want to make it sound like I was lying or anything. Tr. at 38-39. Thus, consistent with the guidance provided in Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978), the search warrant affidavit in this case reveals knowing and reckless falsehoods and omitted material information. This is precisely the type the United States Supreme Court sought…

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00210039.pdf

EFTA00157655Dataset 9

2008-06-1963p27,927w

…was like how old are you. And then I was like 18. But I kind ofsaid it really fast because I didn't want to make it sound like I was lying or anything. . at 38-39. Thus, consistent with the guidance provided in Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978), the search warrant affidavit in this case reveals knowing and reckless falsehoods and omitted material information. This is precisely the type the United States Supreme Court sought to…

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00157655.pdf

EFTA00087230Dataset 9

2016-02-2921p6,032w

…to suppress evidence. Precedent requires courts to adhere to the standards governing analogous Fourth Amendment claims when asked to suppress evidence under their inherent authority. See Lambus, 897 F.3d at 401-02. The Supreme Court has set out a clear standard governing when a misrepresentation to a magistrate in a warrant affidavit justifies suppression of evidence obtained as a result. See Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978). That standard requires more than an inadvertent misstatement. "To suppress…

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00087230.pdf

EFTA00040664Dataset 9

2016-02-2921p6,030w

…to suppress evidence. Precedent requires courts to adhere to the standards governing analogous Fourth Amendment claims when asked to suppress evidence under their inherent authority. See Lambus, 897 F.3d at 401-02. The Supreme Court has set out a clear standard governing when a misrepresentation to a magistrate in a warrant affidavit justifies suppression of evidence obtained as a result. See Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978). That standard requires more than an inadvertent misstatement. "To suppress…

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00040664.pdf

EFTA00102999Dataset 9

2019-03-26239p78,398w

…15, 2007) 234 Falter v. United States, 23 F.2d 420 (2d Cir. 1928) 45 Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391 (1976) 140, 146 Flagg v. Yonkers Say. & Loan Ass 'n, 396 F.3d 178 (2d Cir. 2005) 143 Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978) 166, 169, 170, 171 Gatto, 17 Cr. 686 (LAK) 275 Golino v. City ofNew Haven, 950 F.2d 864 (2d Cir. 1991) 125 Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989…

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00102999.pdf

EFTA00106039Dataset 9

2016-02-2921p6,241w

…to suppress evidence. Precedent requires courts to adhere to the standards governing analogous Fourth Amendment claims when asked to suppress evidence under their inherent authority. See Lambus, 897 F.3d at 401-02. The Supreme Court has set out a clear standard governing when a misrepresentation to a magistrate in a warrant affidavit justifies suppression of evidence obtained as a result. See Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978). That standard requires more than an inadvertent misstatement. "To suppress…

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00106039.pdf

EFTA00066510Dataset 9

2016-02-2921p6,032w

…to suppress evidence. Precedent requires courts to adhere to the standards governing analogous Fourth Amendment claims when asked to suppress evidence under their inherent authority. See Lambus, 897 F.3d at 401-02. The Supreme Court has set out a clear standard governing when a misrepresentation to a magistrate in a warrant affidavit justifies suppression of evidence obtained as a result. See Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978). That standard requires more than an inadvertent misstatement. "To suppress…

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00066510.pdf

EFTA00087251Dataset 9

2016-02-2921p6,032w

…to suppress evidence. Precedent requires courts to adhere to the standards governing analogous Fourth Amendment claims when asked to suppress evidence under their inherent authority. See Lambus, 897 F.3d at 401-02. The Supreme Court has set out a clear standard governing when a misrepresentation to a magistrate in a warrant affidavit justifies suppression of evidence obtained as a result. See Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978). That standard requires more than an inadvertent misstatement. "To suppress…

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00087251.pdf