EFTA01115352Dataset 9
3p1,420w
… 113.20 § 113.20 Statutory Limitations on Award of Punitive Damages General Statutory Cap on Punitive Damages For causes of action arising after October I, 1999, an award of punitive damages generally may not exceed the greater of three times the amount of compensatory damages awarded to each claimant, or the sum of $500,000 [Fla. Stat. § 768.73(I)(a)]. However, a greater amount of damages are permitted in cases in which the fact finder determines that the wrongful…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01115352.pdf
EFTA01193709Dataset 9
2008-07-1611p6,425w
…to state what counts were to be settled pursuant to Appellants/Plaintiffs' Complaint or his own Counterclaim or the procedure for how those claims were to be resolved. Assuming arguendo that Appellee/Defendant's Proposals for Settlement were not ambiguous, they still fail due to their lack of "good faith." §768.79(7)(a), Fla. Stat., provides in pertinent part, "[i]f a party is entitled to costs and fees pursuant to the provisions of this section, the court may…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01193709.pdf
EFTA00209806Dataset 9
2014-04-1816p7,014w
…2007. Extensive plea negotiations ensued between the United States and Epstein. On September 24, 2007, the United States entered into a non-prosecution agreement with Epstein in which the United States agreed not to file any federal charges against Epstein in exchange for his offer to plead guilty to the Florida offenses of solicitation of prostitution and procurement of minors to engage in prostitu- tion. Fla. Stat. §,§ 796.07, 796.03. Not only did the United States neglect to confer…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00209806.pdf
EFTA00181023Dataset 9
124p12,224w
…Furthermore, the h sought to charge Kellen as rejected the claims asserted in the police affidavit (whic was not sufficient probable an accomplice to Appellant) by determining that there second-degree felony offenses cause and not charging Appellant with the serious Sexual Activity with a which the affidavit sought to support, to wit, Unlawful s Molestation, Fla. Stat. Minor, Fla. Stat. § 794.06(1), and Lewd and Lasciviou § 800.04(5). 21 EFTA00181077 . EFTA00181078 was ultimately prosecutable were the charges…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00181023.pdf
EFTA01077101Dataset 9
61p12,214w
…to be a Level 3 sex offender, without designation, under New York's Sexual Offender Registration Act (SORA), Correction Law Article 6-C, based on a 2008 Florida conviction by plea of guilty to Procuring a Person Under 18 for Prostitution, Fla. Stat. § 796.03, and Felony Solicitation of Prostitution, Fla. Stat. § 796.07(2)(f), for which Appellant was sentenced to consecutive terms of 12 months and 6 months incarceration, followed by 12 months of Community Control. (Pickholz, J…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01077101.pdf
EFTA00792343Dataset 9
57p11,385w
…to be a Level 3 sex offender, without designation, under New York's Sexual Offender Registration Act (SORA), Correction Law Article 6-C, based on a 2008 Florida conviction by plea of guilty to Procuring a Person Under 18 for Prostitution, Fla. Stat. § 796.03, and Felony Solicitation of Prostitution, Fla. Stat. § 796.07(2)(f), for which Appellant was sentenced to consecutive terms of 12 months and 6 months incarceration, followed by 12 months of Community Control. (Pickholz, J…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00792343.pdf
EFTA01135038Dataset 9
1995-03-0812p5,852w
…on 63 USLW 2633, 20 Ha. L. Weekly D583 behalf of the child against defendants, we express no opinion on the merits of the case and specifically Footnotes An intermediary represents the adoptive parents and acts as an intermediary for the child's placement. See § 63.085(1)(f), Fla.Stat. (1991). After the court has catered an order preliminarily approving the adoption, the adoptive parents may file an adoption petition. See § 63.112, FlaStat. (1991). "For minors who have…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01135038.pdf
EFTA00723941Dataset 9
2004-01-0111p2,925w
…including personal cell phone records, calendars and diaries and surveillance information, constitute public records subject to disclosure or are statutorily EFTA00723941 protected from disclosure under Florida's Public Records Law, Section 119.071 Fla. Stat., and if the documents and testimony sought constitute private records of the individual officers not otherwise statutorily protected, whether Mr. Epstein's requests are improper as not likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and overly broad. The Town of Palm Beach Police…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00723941.pdf
EFTA00582880Dataset 9
2009-12-2111p3,299w
…Roy, 498 So. 2d 859, 861-62 (Fla. 1986)(check cite). Edwards cannot invoke §57.105, Fla. Stat., to support a claim for punitive damages. He is simply barking up the wrong tree. His motion for leave to amend to assert punitive damages must be denied, STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS On December 21, 2009, Edwards filed an Answer and Counterclaim to Epstein's December 7, 2009 Complaint. In his Counterclaim Edwards purported to state a claim against Epstein…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00582880.pdf
EFTA00598330Dataset 9
2009-12-1612p2,629w
…891 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). Furthermore, these items are irrelevant to the case at hand pursuant to § 90.401 of EFTA00598331 the Florida Statutes, and to the extent that Edwards could argue that any are relevant, any alleged "probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence." § 90.403 FLA. STAT. (2013); Dailey v. Multicon Development, Inc., 417 So.2d 1106, 1107 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). …
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00598330.pdf
EFTA00808719Dataset 9
2017-12-017p1,441w
…and Prejudicial First, Epstein objects to any reference to or admissibility of the New York State Sex Offender registration information at trial because it is irrelevant and prejudicial. §§ 90.401, 90.403, Fla. Stat. The non-admissibility issue is the subject of a separate Motion.' Edwards' Motion Fails to Meet Court Requirements to Reopen Discovery and Seeks Preferential Treatment Second and procedurally, Edwards cannot have it both ways. As the Court made clear in its November 27, 2017, Order and…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00808719.pdf
EFTA00793359Dataset 9
2017-12-046p1,298w
…389 (Fla. 4`h DCA 2004). "Relevant evidence is inadmissible if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice." § 90.403, Fla. Stat. Here, as the Court has already ruled, these extrinsic and wholly unrelated cases are not relevant to the malicious prosecution Counterclaim against Epstein. Rather, these cases unduly prejudice Epstein and would only result in confusion or an attempt to mislead the jury into believing these cases had some relevance to this action. 4…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00793359.pdf
EFTA00585420Dataset 9
2017-09-1525p7,884w
…appear on Edwards's Trial Exhibit List are irrelevant to the case at hand pursuant to § 90.401 of the Florida Statutes, and to the extent that Edwards could argue that any are relevant, any alleged "probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence." § 90.403 FLA. STAT. (2016); Dailey v. Multicon Development, Inc., 417 2 Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE 7'h Street…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00585420.pdf
EFTA01120533Dataset 9
2010-06-3029p8,593w
…June 30, 2010). As the Court stated: It is important to emphasize, at the outset, the limited nature of the review a court may undertake in considering the sufficiency of an evidentiary proffer under Fla. Stat. §768.72. Courts reviewing such proffers have recognized that "a `proffer' according to traditional notions of the teen, connotes merely an `offer' of evidence and neither the term standing alone nor the statute itself calls for an adjudication of the underlying veracity of that…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01120533.pdf
EFTA00802160Dataset 9
2017-09-1525p7,925w
…appear on Edwards's Trial Exhibit List are irrelevant to the case at hand pursuant to § 90.401 of the Florida Statutes, and to the extent that Edwards could argue that any are relevant, any alleged "probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence." § 90.403 FLA. STAT. (2016); Dailey v. Multicon Development, Inc., 417 2 Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE 7'h Street…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00802160.pdf
EFTA00603264Dataset 9
2010-08-1657p11,344w
…Level 3 sex offender, without designation, under New York's Sexual Offender Registration Act (SORA), Correction Law Article 6-C, based on a 2008 Florida conviction by plea of guilty to Procuring a Person Under 18 for Prostitution, Fla. Stat. § 796.03, and Felony Solicitation of Prostitution, Fla. Stat. 796.07(2)(O, for which Appellant was sentenced to consecutive terms of 12 months and 6 months incarceration, followed by 12 months of Community Control. (Pickholz, J. at SORA hearing…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00603264.pdf