esc
Search documents
go
Browse entities
go
Corpus stats
go
About the data
go
AI settings
go
EFTA
Search
Search
Entities
About
Stats
Settings
⌘K
search
Search
Search syntax help
Dataset
Set 1
Set 2
Set 3
Set 4
Set 5
Set 6
Set 7
Set 8
Set 9
Set 10
Set 11
Set 12
Sort
Relevance
Most pages
Most words
Dataset
Newest
Oldest
Status
All
Extracted
Failed
DOJ Status
All
Removed
Available
Modified
Date Range
Undated only
–
Email Headers
Page Count
–
Saved Searches
+
32 results for “
"Exclude Evidence"
”
Export
Keyboard Shortcuts
/
Focus search
Esc
Blur input
O
Open PDF
←
→
Paginate
EFTA00802137
Dataset 9
2011-04-15
2p
466w
…2012 8. BE Notices of Designations Re Page and Line of Depos 9/22/17 Scott Rothstein Depo - 6/14/12 Jeffrey Epstein Depo - 3/17/10 Jeffrey Epstein Depo - 1/25/12 9. Edwards Motion in Limine to Strike 6/30/17 Affidavit ofJE 9/25/17 and to
Exclude Evidence
as to which discovery was withheld under claims of privilege 10. Motion to Strike SJM based on law of the case 9/25/17 11. Motion to Continue…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00802137.pdf
EFTA00090721
Dataset 9
2021-09-03
52p
13,922w
… At a minimum, this Court should hold a Dauber: hearing. 23 IV. THE COURT SHOULD
EXCLUDE EVIDENCE
RELATED 24 V. THE GOVERNMENT CONCEDES THAT IT WILL NOT OFFER EVIDENCE OF MS. MAXWELL'S ALLEGED "FLIGHT" 32 EFTA00090722 VI. THE GOVERNMENT CONCEDES THAT IT WILL NOT OFFER EVIDENCE OF MS. MAXWELL'S ALLEGED FALSE STATEMENTS AND AGREES TO MS. MAXWELL'S PROPOSED REDACTIONS32 VII. THE COURT SHOULD HOLD A PRE-TRIAL EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON MS. MAXWELL'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS IDENTIFICATION…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00090721.pdf
EFTA00702990
Dataset 9
2017-10-25
3p
690w
Subject:
Fwd: Epstein v. Edwards - Meeting Follow Up
From:
Scott Link -4
To:
"
[email protected]
"
[email protected]
>
…Lists - Gunster • List objections to Edwards' Exhibits (due 11/6) - Gunster • Pretrial Stipulation (due 11/15) — Jack/Kara • Bench Memo — Tom/Tim • Review Edwards' deposition designations to determine if we should object/cross-designate (due 11/27) - Gunster • Review pending Motions - Gunster o 9/25/17, Edwards' MIL to Strike the 6/30/17 Affidavit of Epstein and to
Exclude Evidence
as to Which Discovery Was Withheld EFTA00702990 o 9/25/17, Epstein's Omnibus MIL o 10/4/17…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00702990.pdf
EFTA00087774
Dataset 9
2007-05-01
21p
5,654w
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x GHISLAINE MAXWELL'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO
EXCLUDE EVIDENCE
RELATED TO ACCUSER-3 Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim Attorneysfor Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00087774 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 5 I. Applicable…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00087774.pdf
EFTA00072828
Dataset 9
2021-11-04
2p
223w
Subject:
[EXTERNAL] RE: Redactions to MILs
From:
Christian Everdell
To:
, bcstemheim_mac.com
From: Christian Everdell To: , bcstemheim_mac.com Jeff Pagliuca , Laura Menninger Cc: (USANYS)" Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Redactions to MILs Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2021 05:31:16 +0000 Attachments: 002._Motion_to_
Exclude_Evidence
_Prsnt_to_Rule_404(b)_Proposed_Redactions_Revised. pdf; 002a._Ex._A_to_Motion_to_
Exclude_Evidence
_Prsnt_to_Rule_404(13)_Proposed_Redactio ns_Revised.pdf; 004._Motion_to_Exclude_Accuser- 3_Evidence_Proposed_Redactions_Revised.pdf; 013. Motion to Precludeintroduction of Government Exhibits 251…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00072828.pdf
EFTA00074479
Dataset 9
2007-05-01
21p
5,698w
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x GHISLAINE MAXWELL'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO
EXCLUDE EVIDENCE
RELATED TO ACCUSER-3 Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Phone: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver CO 80203 Phone: Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim 225…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00074479.pdf
EFTA00105953
Dataset 9
2021-10-20
1p
29w
From:
(USANYS)"
To:
(USANYS)"
From: (USANYS)" To: (USANYS)" Subject: Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 16:44:59 +0000 Attachments: 2. Motion to
Exclude_Evidence
_Prsnt_to_Rule_404(b).pdf Southern Di ri f N w York Office: Cel Erna' : EFTA00105953
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00105953.pdf
EFTA00025062
Dataset 8
2021-10-29
4p
867w
Subject:
RE: Redactions: Government motion in limine
To:
, Christian Everdell
…limine Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 22:44:53 +0000 Attachments: L_Motion_to_Preclude_the_Introduction_of Alleged_Co- Conspirator Statementsiredacted].pdf; 1a._Ex._1_to Motion to_Preclude_the Introduction_of Alleged_Co- Conspirator Statements_[redacted].pdf; 2._Motion_to_
Exclude_Evidence
_Prsnt_to_Rule_404(b)_[redacted].pdf; 2a._Ex._A_to_Motion_to_
Exclude_Evidence
_Prsnt_to_Rule_404(b)_[redacted].pdf; 3._Motion_to_Exclude_Under_FRE_702_and_Daubertiredacted].pdf; 3b. Ex._22o_Motion…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00025062.pdf
EFTA00622711
Dataset 9
2017-06-30
6p
1,407w
…investigation against Epstein is neither relevant EFTA00622711 EDWARDS ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Reply to Jeffrey Epstein's Response to Bradley Edwards' Motion in Limine to Strike the June 30, 2017 Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein and to
Exclude Evidence
As To Which Discovery Was Withheld Under Claims of Privilege Page 2 of 6 nor material to the current litigation, evidence relating to same would not be probative to the case." Response Pg. 19. That is the foundation of Epstein's…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00622711.pdf
EFTA00601442
Dataset 9
2017-10-03
5p
817w
…205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 ROOM #: 10-C SPECIFIC MATTERS TO BE HEARD: Edwards' Motion in Limine to Strike the June 30, 2017 Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein and to
Exclude Evidence
As To Which Discovery Was Withheld Under Claims of Privilege; Edwards' Motion to Exceed Page Limitations; Edwards' Motion to Compel Substantive Response to Request to Produce Served 4.15.11; Edwards' Motion to Compel Substantive Responses to Requests for Admissions Served 2.26.13; EFTA00601442…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00601442.pdf
EFTA00582821
Dataset 9
2017-06-30
24p
7,457w
…OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN AND TO
EXCLUDE EVIDENCE
AS TO WHICU DISCOVERY WAS WITHHELD UNDER CLAIMS OF PRIVILEGE Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby files his Response to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley Edwards's ("Edwards") Motion in Limine to Strike the June 30, 2017 affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein,' which was filed in support of the undisputed facts as recited in his Motion for Summary Judgment, and to "
exclude evidence
as to which discovery was…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00582821.pdf
EFTA00609379
Dataset 9
2017-03-17
1p
229w
…Defendant's Financial Information in the Liability Phase (DE 662); (2) Defendant's Motion in Limine to Prohibit Questioning Regarding Defendant's Adult Consensual Sexual Activities (DE 665); and (3) Defendant's Motion in Limine to
Exclude Evidence
Barred as a Result of Plaintiff's Summary Judgment Concessions (DE 666). An additional three business days is necessary to adequately brief the issues raised within these motions. Counsel for Ms. Giuffre has conferred with counsel for Defendant and are in agreement…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00609379.pdf
EFTA00089986
Dataset 9
2021-11-10
23p
6,348w
…DOC //: DATE FILED: 11/19/21 United States of America, —v— 20-CR-330 (AJN) Ghislaine Maxwell, MEMORANDUM Defendant. OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: Before the Court is the Defendant's fourth motion in limine to "
exclude evidence
related to Accuser-3," to whom the Court refers as Witness-3, on the grounds that the testimony is not direct evidence of the charged conspiracies and is inadmissible under Federal Rules of Evidence 404(b) and 403. Dkt. Nos…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00089986.pdf
EFTA00090200
Dataset 9
2021-11-10
23p
6,135w
…DOC //: DATE FILED: 11/19/21 United States of America, —v— 20-CR-330 (AJN) Ghislaine Maxwell, MEMORANDUM Defendant. OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: Before the Court is the Defendant's fourth motion in limine to "
exclude evidence
related to Accuser-3," to whom the Court refers as Witness-3, on the grounds that the testimony is not direct evidence of the charged conspiracies and is inadmissible under Federal Rules of Evidence 404(b) and 403. Dkt. Nos…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00090200.pdf
EFTA00595673
Dataset 9
2017-11-29
4p
544w
… Edwards' Motion in Limine to Strike the June 30, 2017 Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein and to
Exclude Evidence
as to which Discovery was withheld under Claims of Privilege with Incorporated Memorandum of Law; Jeffrey Epstein's Response to Bradley Edwards' Motion in Limine to Strike the June 30, 2017 Affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein and to
Exclude Evidence
as to which Discover was withheld under claims of Privilege; Defendant/Counter Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Violation of…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00595673.pdf
EFTA01112444
Dataset 9
2010-03-03
23p
7,116w
…796.09 claim, Defendant also seeks to bifurcate such punitive damages claim from the compensatory damages claim. Related to this motion, Defendant is also filing a motion in limine seeking to
exclude evidence
at all stages of trial of this matter regarding other females who have brought separate civil actions or asserted claims against EPSTEIN (or other purported minors who performed "massages" for EPSTEIN) and what EPSTEIN allegedly did with other females (or minors) and what, if any, were their…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01112444.pdf
EFTA01074684
Dataset 9
1999-04-12
2p
390w
…219650, *17 (Del. Ch. Apr. 12, 1999) (applying the Eagle Industries bar on "backward-looking evidence" to
exclude evidence
of certain shareholders' actions after contract was executed because "none of these dealings bear on what the parties to the [contract] intended at the time they executed it"). Second, this language is not probative of the intended meaning of the 2005 Letter Agreement because it applies to investments subject to the three-year lock-up—Le., not FTC's investment. Worse…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01074684.pdf
EFTA00029100
Dataset 8
2017-04-13
34p
8,943w
…and evidence.'" United States v. Ming He, 94 F.3d 782, 789 (2d Cir. 1996) (quoting McNabb, 318 U.S. at 340). As the Supreme Court held in United States v. Payner, "Federal courts may use their supervisory power in some circumstances to
exclude evidence
taken from the defendant by 'willful disobedience of law."' 447 U.S. 727, 735 (1980) (quoting McNabb, 318 U.S. at 345) (citing Elkins v. United States, 364 U.S. 206, 223 (1960); Rea v…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00029100.pdf
EFTA00028929
Dataset 8
2017-04-13
34p
8,953w
…and evidence.'" United States v. Ming He, 94 F.3d 782, 789 (2d Cir. 1996) (quoting McNabb, 318 U.S. at 340). As the Supreme Court held in United States v. Payner, "Federal courts may use their supervisory power in some circumstances to
exclude evidence
taken from the defendant by 'willful disobedience of law."' 447 U.S. 727, 735 (1980) (quoting McNabb, 318 U.S. at 345) (citing Elkins v. United States, 364 U.S. 206, 223 (1960); Rea v…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00028929.pdf
EFTA00808752
Dataset 9
2011-02-25
12p
3,153w
…as well as the likelihood that it would confuse the true issues in this lawsuit and mislead the jury as to the subject of the claims being tried. See State v. Page, 449 So. 2d 813, 816 (Fla. 1984) ("[S]ection 90.403 of the evidence code enables the trial court to
exclude evidence
of prior convictions, even though relevant, if the probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice."). See also Kelley v. Mutnich, 481 So…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00808752.pdf
1–20 of 32 results · page 1 of 2
«
←
1
2
→
»
Corpus: 1990-03-17 – 2025-12-01
←
April 2011
→
Mo
Tu
We
Th
Fr
Sa
Su
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Undated
(150,429)
None
Light
Medium
Heavy
Results by Dataset
32 total
Set 8
3
Set 9
29