EFTA00808816Dataset 9
2009-12-0738p7,270w
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner, -VS- CASE NO. 4D18-0787 SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, DIZI J. EDWARDS, and II ., ., and JANE DOE, ntervenors,' Respondents. RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI SEARCY DENNY SCAROLA BARNHART & SHIPLEY, E. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 and BURLINGTON & ROCICENBACH, 444 West Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Attorneys for Res ondent Bradley J. Edwards ' Petitioner did not…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00808816.pdf
EFTA00806888Dataset 9
7p1,513w
…Alamo Rent-A-Car Inc. v. Mancusi, 632 So. 2d 1352 (Fla. 1994). Contrary to Edwards' recent characterizations of the lawsuit filed by Epstein against Edwards (on which the malicious prosecution claim is based), Epstein did not allege that Edwards brought false claims. Rather, Epstein previously alleged that Edwards exploited the civil tort lawsuits against Epstein for the purposes of luring investors into the Ponzi scheme that was being carried out under the auspices of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler by attempting…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00806888.pdf
EFTA00584025Dataset 9
2011-08-257p2,194w
…Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 EFTA00584025 an Order reflecting same on February , 2014. A true and correct copy of the Order is attached hereto as "Exhibit B." A Final Judgment has been entered in favor of Epstein against Edwards, and is attached hereto as "Exhibit C." Pursuant to Rule 1.442 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and §768.79 of the Florida Statutes, Epstein is entitled to recover his reasonable attorneys' fees against Edwards that were incurred from the…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00584025.pdf
EFTA00805510Dataset 9
2011-08-2520p3,930w
…Fort Lauderdale, EL 33301 EFTA00805510 19, 2014. A true and correct copy of the Order is attached hereto as "Exhibit B." A Final Judgment has been entered in favor of Epstein against Edwards, and is attached hereto as "Exhibit C." Pursuant to §768.79 of the Florida Statutes and Rule 1.442 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, Epstein is entitled to recover his reasonable costs and attorneys' fees against Edwards that were incurred from the date of the…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00805510.pdf
EFTA00806880Dataset 9
8p1,772w
…See, e.g., Alamo Rent-A- Car Inc. v. Mancusi, 632 So. 2d 1352 (Fla. 1994). Contrary to Edwards' recent characterizations of the lawsuit filed by Epstein against Edwards (on which the malicious prosecution claim is based), Epstein did not allege that Edwards brought false tort claims. Rather, in December 2009, Epstein alleged that Scott Rothstein's partner, Bradley J. Edwards, exploited the civil tort lawsuits against Epstein for the purposes of luring investors into the Ponzi scheme that was…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00806880.pdf
EFTA00808515Dataset 9
2009-12-0734p6,896w
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner, -VS- CASE NO. 4D18-0762 SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. individually, and and JANE DOE, Intervenors.' Respondents RESPONSE TO EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS SEARCY DENNY SCAROLA BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 and BURLINGTON & ROCICENBACH, P.A. 444 West Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Attorneys for Res ondents ' Petitioner did…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00808515.pdf
EFTA00620018Dataset 9
2011-08-2520p3,955w
…Fort Lauderdale, PL 3330P 954.467.1223 EFTA00620018 19, 2014. A true and correct copy of the Order is attached hereto as "Exhibit B." A Final Judgment has been entered in favor of Epstein against Edwards, and is attached hereto as "Exhibit C." Pursuant to §768.79 of the Florida Statutes and Rule 1.442 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, Epstein is entitled to recover his reasonable costs and attorneys' fees against Edwards that were incurred from the…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00620018.pdf
EFTA00584580Dataset 9
2011-08-256p1,574w
…FL 33301. 954.467.1223 EFTA00584580 19, 2014. A true and correct copy of the Order is attached hereto as "Exhibit B." A Final Judgment has been entered in favor of Epstein against Edwards, and is attached hereto as "Exhibit C." Pursuant to §768.79 of the Florida Statutes and Rule 1.442 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, Epstein is entitled to recover his reasonable costs and attorneys' fees against Edwards that were incurred from the date of…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00584580.pdf
EFTA00801365Dataset 9
47p8,885w
…three, 8 that we are not going to go into any detail 9 whatsoever as to the nature of any claims 10 Mr. Edwards was not lead counsel. It is 11 solely to show the exposure that Mr. Epstein 12 faced going forward. 13 It will only be admissible to show the 14 timing of the suit that was brought by 15 Epstein against Edwards, to explain the 16 reasons why, from the counter-plaintiff's 17 side, Edwards' side…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00801365.pdf
EFTA01121870Dataset 9
2012-05-217p1,573w
…state a case showing a legal liability, and must plead factual matter sufficient to apprise his adversary of what he is called upon to answer.) Accordingly, 3 EFTA01121872 Epstein is unable to admit or deny the inflammatory, non-factual, argumentative allegations. and as such properly responded to same. Next. Paragraphs 11 and Paragraph 27 of Defendant's Third Amended Counterclaim both state: The claims filed by EPSTEIN against EDWARDS included the following: a. Violation of F.S. §§772.101, et…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01121870.pdf
EFTA01121877Dataset 9
2012-05-217p1,581w
…a case showing a legal liability, and must plead factual matter sufficient to apprise his adversary of what he is called upon to answer.) Accordingly, 3 EFTA01121879 Epstein is unable to admit or deny the inflammatory, non-factual, argumentative allegations. and as such properly responded to same. Next. Paragraphs 11 and Paragraph 27 of Defendant's Third Amended Counterclaim both state: The claims filed by EPSTEIN against EDWARDS included the following: a. Violation of F.S. §§772.101, et seq…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01121877.pdf
EFTA00292184Dataset 9
2011-10-048p1,574w
…and has never had any reasonable basis to believe otherwise. 9. Nevertheless, EPSTEIN filed civil claims against EDWARDS and EDWARDS' client, L.M. for the sole purpose of further attempting to intimidate EDWARDS, L.M., and others into abandoning or settling their legitimate claims for less than their just and reasonable value. 10. The claims filed by EPSTEIN against EDWARDS included the following: a. violation of F.S. §§772.101, et. seq.— Florida Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act; b…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00292184.pdf
EFTA00793693Dataset 9
2018-03-0824p4,964w
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT Appellate Case No.: LT Case No: 502009CA0408003OOOCMB AG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner/Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Respondents/Defendants. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI On Review of a Non-Final Order of the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esq. Scott J. Link, Esq. Rachel J. Glasser, Esq. Link & Rockenbach, PA Appellate…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00793693.pdf