esc
Search documents
go
Browse entities
go
Corpus stats
go
About the data
go
AI settings
go
EFTA
Search
Search
Entities
About
Stats
Settings
⌘K
search
Search
Search syntax help
Dataset
Set 1
Set 2
Set 3
Set 4
Set 5
Set 6
Set 7
Set 8
Set 9
Set 10
Set 11
Set 12
Sort
Relevance
Most pages
Most words
Dataset
Newest
Oldest
Status
All
Extracted
Failed
DOJ Status
All
Removed
Available
Modified
Date Range
Undated only
–
Email Headers
Page Count
–
Saved Searches
+
192 results for “
"E.D. N.Y. 2011"
”
Export
Keyboard Shortcuts
/
Focus search
Esc
Blur input
O
Open PDF
←
→
Paginate
Corpus: 1990-03-17 – 2025-12-01
←
August 2014
→
Mo
Tu
We
Th
Fr
Sa
Su
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Undated
(150,429)
None
Light
Medium
Heavy
EFTA02100128
Dataset 10
2014-08-05
24p
1,739w
Subject:
Fwd: E-Ticket Confirmation-BAKKOG 06AUG
To:
zorro.office mail.com zorro.office mail.com];
…e EFTA_R1_00706237 EFTA02100130 t f 0 r t h e k e r h
e d
e e r n n d r e n h EFTA_R1_00706238 EFTA02100131 d 0 m e 0 t h r 9 h 0 t r t r 0 m h e k n n 0 b EFTA_R1_00706239 EFTA02100132 t a i
n Y
0 u r b 0 a r d i n 9 P a s s…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA02100128.pdf
EFTA00208106
Dataset 9
2011-04-07
9p
2,411w
…more requires disclosure of the pre- sentence report to meet its remedial goal of giving crime victims a voice in sentencing than it does disclosure of all discovery in a criminal case to promote the goal of giving victims a voice at 2 EFTA00208107 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 59 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/
2011
Page 3 of 9 plea proceedings. Id., citing United States v. Ingrassia 2005 WL 2875220 at *17 (
E.D
.
N.Y
…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00208106.pdf
EFTA00208013
Dataset 9
2011-05-02
11p
3,071w
…best efforts" obligations under the CVRA, as it is not clear whether the facts of these cases (or the victims' attorneys) presented the "best efforts" issue with regard to the Government withholding material evidence. 2 EFTA00208014 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 76 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/02/
2011
Page 3 of 11 Moreover, the first CVRA case cited by the Government — United States'. Rahn. 558 F.Supp.2d 411 (
E.D
.
N.Y
. 2008) - specifically contradicts the…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00208013.pdf
EFTA00040628
Dataset 9
2020-05-18
28p
8,044w
…United States v. Barrera, 950 F. Supp. 2d 461, 478 (
E.D
.
N.Y
. 2013) ("As a general rule, a defendant is not entitled to receive details of the government's conspiracy allegations in a bill of particulars."); United States v. Wilson, 493 F. Supp. 2d 364, 372 (
E.D
.
N.Y
. 2006) (same, denying motion for a bill of particulars as to the dates on which the defendant and his co-conspirators joined the charged conspiracy); Rivera, 2017 WL…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00040628.pdf
EFTA00145643
Dataset 9
2023-11-02
23p
6,343w
…and 3 objected); Willix v. Health,first, Inc.,
2011
WL 754862, at *4 (
E.D
.
N.Y
. Feb. 18,
2011
) (granting final approval of the settlement where 7 out of 2,025 class members objected and 2 opted out); Bellifemine v. Sanafi—Aventis U.S. LLC, 2010 WL 3119374, at *3 (S.D.
N.Y
. Aug. 6, 2010) (granting final approval where there were no objections but 23 of 5,262 opted out, noting that "[a] small number of objections…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00145643.pdf
EFTA01098374
Dataset 9
2011-08-12
24p
7,396w
…Bottaro v. Hatton Assocs., 96 F.R.D. 158, 159-60 (
E.D
.
N.Y
. 1982) ("the object of the inquiry must have some evidentiary value before an order to compel disclosure of otherwise inadmissible material will issue"). Such a burden-shifting analysis is particularly important where the discovery is protected by a rule of inadmissibility, where the plaintiffs have not identified any principled basis for discovery other than to seek to admit the plea communications in evidence, and where…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01098374.pdf
EFTA01098253
Dataset 9
2011-05-02
11p
3,206w
…best efforts" obligations under the CVRA, as it is not clear whether the facts of these cases (or the victims' attorneys) presented the "best efforts" issue with regard to the Government withholding material evidence. 2 EFTA01098254 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 76 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/02/
2011
Page 3 of 11 Moreover, the first CVRA case cited by the Government — United States v. Rubin, 558 F.Supp.2d 411 (
E.D
.
N.Y
. 2008) - specifically contradicts…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01098253.pdf
EFTA00027307
Dataset 8
2020-04-24
34p
10,823w
…criminal charges, it is not discoverable under Rule 16. Id.; see also United States v. Defreitas, No. 07 Cr. 543 (DLI),
2011
WL 317964, at *10 (
E.D
.
N.Y
. Jan. 31,
2011
) (rejecting discovery request related to something that is "not a defense" and has "nothing to do with the issues of whether defendants . . . committed the ... crimes charged"). Since jury nullification is "a practice whereby a juror votes in purposeful disregard of the evidence," United States v. Thomas, 116…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00027307.pdf
EFTA00031263
Dataset 8
2011-01-31
34p
10,482w
…criminal charges, it is not discoverable under Rule 16. Id.; see also United States v. Defreitas, No. 07 Cr. 543 (DLI),
2011
WL 317964, at *10 (
E.D
.
N.Y
. Jan. 31,
2011
) (rejecting discovery request related to something that is "not a defense" and has "nothing to do with the issues of whether defendants ... committed the . . . crimes charged"). Since jury nullification is "a practice whereby a juror votes in purposeful disregard of the evidence," United States v. Thomas, 116…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00031263.pdf
EFTA00212572
Dataset 9
2008-08-14
15p
4,582w
…United States v. Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d 411, 428 (
E.D
.
N.Y
. 2008). 4 EFTA00212575 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 58 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07'
2011
Page 5 of 15 criminal charges against Jeffrey Epstein. That fact is undisputed. Accordingly, all of the "facts" contained in Petitioners' statement are not "material" and the resolution of those "facts" will not "expedite the trial." Quite simply, all of the allegations, inferences, and innuendos contained in Petitioners…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00212572.pdf
EFTA00090721
Dataset 9
2021-09-03
52p
13,922w
…CR-129, 2012 WL 1071207 (
E.D
. Tenn. Mar. 29, 2012) 3 United States v. Brewington, No. 15-CR-00073-PAB, 2018 WL 1411274 (D. Colo. Mar. 21, 2018) 3 United States v. Bums, No. 07 CR 556, 2009 WL 3617448 (N.D. III. Oct. 27, 2009) 20, 21 United States v. Cummings, 60 F. Supp. 3d 434 (S.D.
N.Y
. 2014) 26 United States v. Curley, 639 F.3d 50 (2d Cir.
2011
) 26 United States v. Curley…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00090721.pdf
EFTA00103380
Dataset 9
2010-01-21
36p
11,826w
…Supp. 2d 831 (S.D.
N.Y
. 2009) 27 United States v. English, 629 F.3d 311 (2d Cir.
2011
) 7 United States v. Epstein, 155 F. Supp. 2d 323 (
E.D
. Pa. 2001) 28 United States v. Epstein, 425 F. Supp. 3d 306 (S.D.
N.Y
. 2019) 15, 29 United States v. Esposito, 309 F. Supp. 3d 24 (S.D.
N.Y
. 2018) 27 United States v. Georgiou, No. 08-1220-M, 2008 WL 4306750 (
E.D
. Pa…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00103380.pdf
EFTA00595583
Dataset 9
2015-11-30
29p
8,962w
…as the January 3 Statement are not actionable as defamatory statements. See McNamee v. Clemens, 762 F.Supp.2d 584, 601 (
E.D
.
N.Y
.
2011
) ("general denials of accusations aren't actionable"); Independent Living Aids, Inc. v. Mau-Aids, Inc., 981 F.Supp. 124, 128 (
E.D
.
N.Y
. 1997) (epithet "liar," in context, where it reflects a mere denial of accusations, was personal opinion and rhetorical hyperbole). The context surrounding the January 3 Statement demonstrates it was a…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00595583.pdf
EFTA00605112
Dataset 9
2016-06-20
29p
7,816w
…90 (W.D.
N.Y
.
2011
); compare Reese v. Intern. Terminals, Inc., 286 F.R.D. 282 (
E.D
. Va. 2012) (depositions noticed very early in discovery period and movant engaged in continuing meet-and-confer dialogue with defendants throughout five month discovery period); lantosta v. Benistar Admin. Svcs., Inc., 765 F.Supp.2d 79 (D. Mass.
2011
) (correspondence indicated that the plaintiffs had tried on numerous occasions to schedule the depositions and to extend the discovery schedule but that…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00605112.pdf
EFTA00801426
Dataset 9
2011-04-14
34p
9,651w
…Farhane, 634 F.3d 127, 145 (2d Cir.
2011
) ("attempt requires proof that a defendant (a) had the intent to commit the object crime and (b) engaged in conduct amounting to a substantial step towards its commission"); Stein v. World-Wide Plumbing Supply Inc., 71 F. Supp. 3d 320, 330 (
E.D
.
N.Y
. 2014) ("a claim of attempt requires plaintiff to allege that defendants had the intent to commit the underlying crime"). Here, there are no factual allegations in…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00801426.pdf
EFTA00154326
Dataset 9
2020-07-14
22p
6,908w
…courts have observed, "home detention with electronic monitoring does not prevent flight; at best, it limits a fleeing defendant's head start." United States v. Zarger, No. 00- CR-773-S-1 (JG), 2000 WL 1134364, at *I (
E.D
.
N.Y
. Aug. 4, 2000). Furthermore, while the Defendant now represents that she would be released to the custody of a family member, who would serve as the Defendant's third-party custodian under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(c…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00154326.pdf
EFTA00075024
Dataset 9
2006-10-23
31p
8,486w
…Massino, 356 F. Supp. 2d 227, 235 (
E.D
.
N.Y
. 2005) (recognizing that law enforcement's efforts "to stamp out organized crime in this District" were "a matter of vital public concern" and that the public had "a legitimate interest in being able to review materials that helped to ensure that the reputed boss of a notorious organized crime family will spend the rest of his natural life in a federal prison"); see also Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00075024.pdf
EFTA00619558
Dataset 9
2016-06-20
29p
7,801w
…90 (W.D.
N.Y
.
2011
); compare Reese v. Virginia Intern. Terminals, Inc., 286 F.R.D. 282 (
E.D
. Va. 2012) (depositions noticed very early in discovery period and movant engaged in continuing meet-and-confer dialogue with defendants throughout five month discovery period); lantosca v. Benistar Admin. Svcs., Inc., 765 F.Supp.2d 79 (D. Mass.
2011
) (correspondence indicated that the plaintiffs had tried on numerous occasions to schedule the depositions and to extend the discovery schedule but…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00619558.pdf
EFTA00097359
Dataset 9
17p
4,078w
…United States v. Broccolo, 797 F. Supp. 1185 (S.D.
N.Y
. 1992) 3 United States v. Burke, 789 F. Supp. 2d 395 (S.D.
N.Y
.
2011
) 5 United States v. Cohn, 230 F. Supp. 587 (S.D.
N.Y
. 1964) 4 United States v. Cunningham, 672 F.2d 1064 (2d Cir. 1982) 10 United States v. Gotti, 771 F. Supp. 552 (
E.D
.
N.Y
. 1991) 10 United States v. Halper, 590 F.2d 422 (2d Cir. 1978)…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00097359.pdf
EFTA00802452
Dataset 9
1997-03-04
25p
6,896w
…1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22542, at *22 (
E.D
.
N.Y
. Feb. 26, 1998) (granting motion to dismiss based on statute of limitations in part because "plaintiffs [did] not allege[] any facts suggesting that they exercised due diligence in discovering their injuries."). The law is clear that this is not an extraordinary situation in which an equitable tolling period or discovery rule may apply: Equitable tolling of the statute of limitations is applied "only in `rare and exceptional circumstances…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00802452.pdf
1–20 of 192 results · page 1 of 10
«
←
1
2
…
10
→
»
Results by Dataset
192 total
Set 8
22
Set 9
159
Set 10
11