EFTA01726257Dataset 10
2006-07-1913p6,633w
…violated the CVRA in failing to afford victims a reasonable right to confer with the government about the NPA before the agreement was signed and that the government affirmatively misled victims about the status of the federal investigation. During the course of its investigation, OPR obtained and reviewed hundreds of thousands of records from the USAO, the FBI, and other Department components, including the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, the Criminal Division, and the Executive Office for U.S…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01726257.pdf
EFTA00013359Dataset 8
2006-07-1913p6,629w
…violated the CVRA in failing to afford victims a reasonable right to confer with the government about the NPA before the agreement was signed and that the government affirmatively misled victims about the status of the federal investigation. During the course of its investigation, OPR obtained and reviewed hundreds of thousands of records from the USAO, the FBI, and other Department components, including the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, the Criminal Division, and the Executive Office for U.S…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00013359.pdf
EFTA01250797Dataset 9
2006-07-1913p6,632w
…violated the CVRA in failing to afford victims a reasonable right to confer with the government about the NPA before the agreement was signed and that the government affirmatively misled victims about the status of the federal investigation. During the course of its investigation, OPR obtained and reviewed hundreds of thousands of records from the USAO, the FBI, and other Department components, including the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, the Criminal Division, and the Executive Office for U.S…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01250797.pdf
EFTA00023059Dataset 8
2006-07-1914p6,635w
…violated the CVRA in failing to afford victims a reasonable right to confer with the government about the NPA before the agreement was signed and that the government affirmatively misled victims about the status of the federal investigation. During the course of its investigation, OPR obtained and reviewed hundreds of thousands of records from the USAO, the FBI, and other Department components, including the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, the Criminal Division, and the Executive Office for U.S…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00023059.pdf
EFTA00011475Dataset 8
2006-07-1914p6,638w
…violated the CVRA in failing to afford victims a reasonable right to confer with the government about the NPA before the agreement was signed and that the government affirmatively misled victims about the status of the federal investigation. During the course of its investigation, OPR obtained and reviewed hundreds of thousands of records from the USAO, the FBI, and other Department components, including the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, the Criminal Division, and the Executive Office for U.S…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00011475.pdf
EFTA00095558Dataset 9
2006-07-1914p6,638w
…violated the CVRA in failing to afford victims a reasonable right to confer with the government about the NPA before the agreement was signed and that the government affirmatively misled victims about the status of the federal investigation. During the course of its investigation, OPR obtained and reviewed hundreds of thousands of records from the USAO, the FBI, and other Department components, including the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, the Criminal Division, and the Executive Office for U.S…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00095558.pdf
EFTA00095727Dataset 9
2006-07-1914p6,633w
…violated the CVRA in failing to afford victims a reasonable right to confer with the government about the NPA before the agreement was signed and that the government affirmatively misled victims about the status of the federal investigation. During the course of its investigation, OPR obtained and reviewed hundreds of thousands of records from the USAO, the FBI, and other Department components, including the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, the Criminal Division, and the Executive Office for U.S…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00095727.pdf
EFTA01128629Dataset 9
2013-07-012p523w
…July 1, 2013). See Memorandum from Craig S. Morford, Acting Deputy Att'y Gen., U.S. Dep't of Justice, to Heads of Department Components, U.S. Att'ys re: Selection and Use of Monitors in Deferred Prosecution Agreements and Non—Prosecution Agreements with Corporations (Mar. 7, 2008) at note 2, available at http://www.justice.gov/usarn/criminal-resource-manual-163-selection-and- use-monitors (last visited February 26, 2016) ("In the nonprosecution agreement context, formal charges are not…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01128629.pdf
EFTA00589566Dataset 9
2013-07-0811p3,198w
…not result in the institution of criminal charges. See Memorandum from Craig S. Morford, Acting Deputy Att'y Gen., U.S. Dep't of Justice, to Heads of Department Components, U.S. Att'ys re: Selection and Use of Monitors in Deferred Prosecution Agreements and Non-Prosecution Agreements with Corporations (Mar. 7, 2008) at note 2, available at http://www.justice.gov/usarn/criminal- resource-manual-163-selection-and-use-monitors (last visited February 26, 2016) ("In the 5 EFTA00589570…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00589566.pdf
EFTA01128645Dataset 9
2013-07-0811p3,203w
…result in the institution of criminal charges. See Memorandum from Craig S. Morford, Acting Deputy Att'y Gen., U.S. Dep't of Justice, to Heads of Department Components, U.S. Att'ys re: Selection and Use of Monitors in Deferred Prosecution Agreements and Non- 5 EFTA01128649 Prosecution Agreements with Corporations (Mar. 7, 2008) at note 2, available at http://www.justice.gov/usam/criminal-resource-manual-163-selection-and-use-monitors (last visited February 26, 2016) ("In the nonprosecution…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01128645.pdf
EFTA01128544Dataset 9
2016-04-0511p2,804w
…do not result in the institution of criminal charges. See Memorandum from Craig S. Morford, Acting Deputy Att'y Gen., U.S. Dep't of Justice, to Heads of Department Components, U.S. Att'ys re: Selection and Use of Monitors in Deferred Prosecution Agreements and Non-Prosecution Agreements with Corporations (Mar. 7, 2008) at note 2, available at http://www.justice.gov/usarnkriminal- resource-manual-163-selection-and-use-monitors (last visited February 26, 2016) ("In the nonprosecution agreement…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01128544.pdf
EFTA00812291Dataset 9
2019-02-2112p4,127w
…at 733 (describing nonprosecution agreements as the "out-of-court analogue[]" of deferred prosecution agreements); see also Memorandum from Craig S. Morford, Acting Deputy Att'y Gen., U.S. Dep't of Justice, to Heads of Department Components, U.S. Att'ys re: Selection and Use of Monitors in Deferred Prosecution Agreements and Non—Prosecution Agreements with Corporations (Mar. 7, 2008) at note 2, available at http://www.justice.gov/usam/criminal- resource-manual-163-selection-and-use-monitors (last…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00812291.pdf
EFTA00621909Dataset 9
2016-03-027p3,640w
… instead it was the norm. See Memorandum from Craig S. Morford, Acting Deputy Att'y Gen., U.S. Dept of Justice, to Heads of Department Components, U.S. Att'ys re: Selection and Use of Monitors in Deferred Prosecution Agreements and Non— Prosecution Agreements with Corporations (Mar. 7. 2008) at note 2 available at (last visited February 26, 2016) ("In the nonprosecution agreement context, formal charges are not filed and the agreement is maintained by the parties rather than beingfiled…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00621909.pdf
EFTA00211543Dataset 9
2016-04-2215p3,396w
…precede the institution of federal criminal charges. See Memorandum from Craig S. Morford, Acting Deputy Att'y Gen., U.S. Dep't of Justice, to Heads of Department Components, U.S. Att'ys re: Selection and Use of Monitors in Deferred Prosecution Agreements and Non—Prosecution Agreements with Corporations 9 EFTA00211551 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 385 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/22/2016 Page 10 of 15 (Mar. 7, 2008) at note 2, available at http://www…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00211543.pdf
EFTA00812487Dataset 9
2016-04-2215p3,442w
…precede the institution of federal criminal charges. See Memorandum from Craig S. Morford, Acting Deputy Att'y Gen., U.S. Dep't of Justice, to Heads of Department Components, U.S. Att'ys re: Selection and Use of Monitors in Deferred Prosecution Agreements and Non—Prosecution Agreements with Corporations 9 EFTA00812495 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 385 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/22/2016 Page 10 of 15 (Mar. 7, 2008) at note 2, available at http://www…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00812487.pdf
EFTA01098196Dataset 9
2016-04-2215p3,442w
…precede the institution of federal criminal charges. See Memorandum from Craig S. Morford, Acting Deputy Att'y Gen., U.S. Dep't of Justice, to Heads of Department Components, U.S. Att'ys re: Selection and Use of Monitors in Deferred Prosecution Agreements and Non—Prosecution Agreements with Corporations 9 EFTA01098204 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 385 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/22/2016 Page 10 of 15 (Mar. 7, 2008) at note 2, available at http://www…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01098196.pdf