esc
Search documents
go
Browse entities
go
Corpus stats
go
About the data
go
AI settings
go
EFTA
Search
Search
Entities
About
Stats
Settings
⌘K
search
Search
Search syntax help
Dataset
Set 1
Set 2
Set 3
Set 4
Set 5
Set 6
Set 7
Set 8
Set 9
Set 10
Set 11
Set 12
Sort
Relevance
Most pages
Most words
Dataset
Newest
Oldest
Status
All
Extracted
Failed
DOJ Status
All
Removed
Available
Modified
Date Range
Undated only
–
Email Headers
Page Count
–
Saved Searches
+
120 results for “
"Deliberative Process"
”
Export
Keyboard Shortcuts
/
Focus search
Esc
Blur input
O
Open PDF
←
→
Paginate
Corpus: 1990-03-17 – 2025-12-01
←
September 2013
→
Mo
Tu
We
Th
Fr
Sa
Su
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Undated
(150,429)
None
Light
Medium
Heavy
EFTA00209304
Dataset 9
2013-09-21
2p
504w
Subject:
Re:
Deliberative Process
Declaration from Main Justice - Request for Two Week Extension
From:
' (USAFLS)" <
To:
[email protected]
edit' <
…USAFLS)" < To:
[email protected]
edit' < ft" Cc: ' (USAFLS)" < Subject: Re:
Deliberative Process
Declaration from Main Justice - Request for Two Week Extension Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 03:45:04 +0000 Importance: Normal Paul and Brad, Thanks very much. From: Paul Cassell [mailto: Sent: Frida September 20, 2013 01:59 PM To: USAFLS • Brad Edwards ( < > Cc: . (USAFLS) Subject: RE:
Deliberative Process
Declaration from Main Justice - Request for Two Week Extension Fii We have no objection…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00209304.pdf
EFTA00015219
Dataset 8
2020-05-26
58p
17,292w
Author: CGM Reviewed: TLC 3/10/21, 3/11/21
Deliberative Process
/Attorney-Client/Attorney Work Product Privileged IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RADAR ONLINE LLC and JAMES ROBERTSON, Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-03956-PGG FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Defendant. DECLARATION OF MICHAEL G. SEIDEL I, Michael G. Seidel, declare as follows: (1) I am the Section Chief of the Record/Information Dissemination Section ("RIDS"), Information Management Division…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00015219.pdf
EFTA01325051
Dataset 10
2015-06-23
20p
5,529w
…Product Braden regarding status of meeting in DC and concerns regarding delay.
Deliberative Process
6(e) Investigative Privilege P-014559 1/28/2008-1/29/2008 emails between Marie Villafafia and Myesha Work Product thru Braden regarding scheduling victim interviews on 1/31/2008-2/1/2008 6(e) P-014562 Investigative Privilege Also contains information subject to privacy rights of victims who are not parties to this litigation P-014563 1/30/2008 emails between Marie Villafafia, Alex Acosta…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01325051.pdf
EFTA01325031
Dataset 10
2015-06-23
20p
5,519w
…Product Braden regarding status of meeting in DC and concerns regarding delay.
Deliberative Process
6(e) Investigative Privilege P-014559 1/28/2008-1/29/2008 emails between Marie Villafafia and Myesha Work Product thru Braden regarding scheduling victim interviews on 1/31/2008-2/1/2008 6(e) P-014562 Investigative Privilege Also contains information subject to privacy rights of victims who are not parties to this litigation P-014563 1/30/2008 emails between Marie Villafafia, Alex Acosta…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01325031.pdf
EFTA00020711
Dataset 8
2015-06-23
18p
5,088w
…Product Braden regarding status of meeting in DC and concerns regarding delay.
Deliberative Process
6(e) Investigative Privilege P-014559 1/28/2008-1/29/2008 emails between Marie Villafafia and Myesha Work Product thru Braden regarding scheduling victim interviews on 1/31/2008-2/1/2008 6(e) P-014562 Investigative Privilege Also contains information subject to privacy rights of victims who are not parties to this litigation P-014563 1/30/2008 emails between Marie Villafafia, Alex Acosta…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00020711.pdf
EFTA00594171
Dataset 9
2015-06-23
18p
5,082w
…Product Braden regarding status of meeting in DC and concerns regarding delay.
Deliberative Process
6(e) Investigative Privilege P-014559 1/28/2008-1/29/2008 emails between Marie Villafafia and Myesha Work Product thru Braden regarding scheduling victim interviews on 1/31/2008-2/1/2008 6(e) P-014562 Investigative Privilege Also contains information subject to privacy rights of victims who are not parties to this litigation P-014563 1/30/2008 emails between Marie Villafafia, Alex Acosta…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00594171.pdf
EFTA00208672
Dataset 9
2013-08-16
10p
2,324w
…result of the Government's failures, it is impossible to even begin to determine which of the Government's assertions of privilege are valid. Failure to Prove Factual Underpinnings of Privilege Claim — Most of the Government's privilege assertions rest on factual underpinnings (e.g., an attorney-client relationship is at issue, a
deliberative process
is at issue) that have not been proven by any materials in the record. Accordingly, these assertions of privilege are inadequate. See Bogle v. McClure…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00208672.pdf
EFTA00211410
Dataset 9
2013-06-18
20p
5,424w
…Product Braden regarding status of meeting in DC and concerns regarding delay.
Deliberative Process
6(e) Investigative Privilege P-014559 1/28/2008-1/29/2008 emails between Marie Villafafia and Myesha Work Product thru Braden regarding scheduling victim interviews on 1/31/2008-2/1/2008 6(e) P-014562 Investigative Privilege Also contains information subject to privacy rights of victims who are not parties to this litigation P-014563 1/30/2008 emails between Marie Villafafia, Alex Acosta…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00211410.pdf
EFTA02731069
Dataset 12
2019-12-05
13p
1,211w
PRIVILEGED - ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT/
DELIBERATIVE PROCESS
CONFIDENTIAL - SUBJECT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) MEMORANDUM TO: Geoffre S. Berman. U.S. Attorne FROM: AUSAs DATE: December 5, 2019 RE: Analysis of Possible Corporate Prosecution In connection with the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein for sex trafficking, we have been asked to analyze the feasibility of bringing criminal charges against one or more Epstein-controlled co ..rate entities that fonnall owned 'ro. dies at which he abused certain minor victims. As…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02731069.pdf
EFTA00208560
Dataset 9
2013-09-20
2p
410w
Fr • < > Subjec :
Deliberative Process
t ec aratton rom am Justice - equest or wo ee xtension Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 17:59:47 +0000 Importance: Normal We have no objection, provided we get the following accommodation, which you already anticipated. We would request that your motion for extension of time give us an extension on our reply document, such that our reply would be due 10 days after the main Justice Department declaration that will be coming in…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00208560.pdf
EFTA01659346
Dataset 10
1p
212w
Subject:
DMV- EPSTEIN, JEFFREY 01201953
Front To Cc Subject: DMV- EPSTEIN, JEFFREY 01201953 Dale: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 19:12:34 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: DMV-_EPSTEINJEFFREY_01201953.docx Lejederal Bureau of Investigation 1908.2010 NEW YORK OPERATIONS CENTER 212-384-2921 Confidentiality Statement: • ••• This message may contain information that is
deliberative process
privileged information"•• This message is transmitted to you by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. This message, along with any attachments, may be privileged or otherwise protected. If you are not the intended…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01659346.pdf
EFTA00209347
Dataset 9
2013-07-03
2p
678w
Subject:
RE: Jane Does. United States - Redacted Pleadings
To:
Sanchez, Eduardo (USAFLS); Lee, Dexter (USAFLS)
…Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 17:09:21 +0000 Importance: Normal The primary privileges we will be asserting are attorney-client, attorney work product, and
deliberative process
. For
deliberative process
, the document must be pre-decisional, and include recommendations, opinions, or deliberations, usually from a subordinate to a superior. For instance, your May 1, 2007 "Operation Leap Year" prosecution memo would fall squarely within the
deliberative process
privilege. From: Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 12:21 PM To: Sanchez, Eduardo…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00209347.pdf
EFTA00037844
Dataset 8
2019-09-12
1p
235w
Subject:
Outside Caller -
From:
NY_OPSCENTER
[email protected]
>
…
[email protected]
> To: Subject: Outside Caller - Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 01:07:01 +0000 Importance: Normal s lIederal Bureau of Investigation 1908 • 2010 Good Evening SA En The NYOC today received a call from a in regards to the Jeffrey Epstein case. Thank You, NEW YORK OPERATIONS CENTER 212.384.2921 Confidentiality Statement: • ••• This message may contain information that is
deliberative process
privileged information•••• This message is transmitted to you by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. This message…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00037844.pdf
EFTA00015511
Dataset 8
2019-07-23
4p
1,176w
…BOP, 20 Civ. 833 (SONY) Index of Withholdings in Full Entry Page count Description Status Withheld in Full (WIF) under 7(A); Exemptions 6 and 7(C) applicable in 1 2 Incident Report of Jeffrey Epstein's July 23, 2019 Apparent Suicide Attempt part WIF under 7(A); Exemptions 5 (
Deliberative Process
Privilege), 6, 2 37 Psychological Reconstruction of Inmate Death 7(C), 7(E), and 7(F) applicable in part WIF under 7(A); Exemptions 6, 7(C), 3…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00015511.pdf
EFTA00088648
Dataset 9
2019-07-23
4p
1,176w
…BOP, 20 Civ. 833 (SDNY) Index of Withholdings in Full Entry Page count Description Status Withheld in Full (WIF) under 7(A); Exemptions 6 and 7(C) applicable in 1 2 Incident Report of Jeffrey Epstein's July 23, 2019 Apparent Suicide Attempt part WIF under 7(A); Exemptions 5 (
Deliberative Process
Privilege), 6, 2 37 Psychological Reconstruction of Inmate Death 7(C), 7(E), and 7(F) applicable in part WIF under 7(A); Exemptions 6, 7(C), 3…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00088648.pdf
EFTA00795136
Dataset 9
2013-09-04
4p
691w
…Ferrer was filed on September 20, 2013. 4. On September 20, 2013, the Office of Professional Responsibility advised the undersigned that the DOJ had not decided against invoking the
deliberative process
privilege. The reason no declaration was provided on September 13, 2013, was because the Office of the Deputy Attorney General (ODAG) believed the undersigned was working with another DOJ component and had obtained the declaration. The undersigned spoke with OPR, who advised that it needed an additional fourteen (14…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00795136.pdf
EFTA00165025
Dataset 9
2020-07-16
1p
293w
Subject:
Outside Caller
…Taub also believes his client might have wrongly recorded the name of the detective or special agent who contacted her. If you had in fact attempted to contact Mr. Taub's client, he would like a call back at NEW YORK OPERATIONS CENTER Confidentiality Statement: • •• • This message may contain information that is
deliberative process
privileged information•••• This message is transmitted to you by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. This message, along with any attachments, may be privileged or otherwise protected…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00165025.pdf
EFTA00208682
Dataset 9
2013-08-16
70p
20,257w
…Covered Crime-Fraud-Misconduct Factual Materials Not Covered Factual Materials Documents Not Prepared in Anticipation of CVRA Litigation Not in Anticipation of Litigation Attorney Client Objections - Ordinary Governmental Communications Not Covered Ordinary Government Communication Attorney-Client Relationship Not Established No Attorney-Client Relationship
Deliberative Process
Objections - Privilege Not Properly Invoked Improper Invocation Final Decision Exempted from Privilege Final Decision Qualified Privilege Overridden By the Victims' Need for the Documents Overriding Need Investigative Privilege - Privilege Not Properly Invoked Improper Invocation Qualified…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00208682.pdf
EFTA00164582
Dataset 9
2025-03-16
1p
406w
… another federal statute. application. (b)(4) Trade secrets and commercial or financial N/A Exemption waived information. in full. (b)(5) Attorney work product privilege, attorney- N/A Exemption waived client privilege,
deliberative process
privilege. in full. (b)(6) / Records or information compiled for law Limited to victim identities, federal law Considerably limits (b)(7)(C) enforcement purposes that could reasonably enforcement identities, third party personally scope of be expected to constitute an unwarranted identifiable information, and names and/or…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00164582.pdf
EFTA00099641
Dataset 9
2019-07-23
4p
1,176w
…BOP, 20 Civ. 833 (SDNY) Index of Withholdings in Full Entry Page count Description Status Withheld in Full (WIF) under 7(A); Exemptions 6 and 7(C) applicable in 1 2 Incident Report of Jeffrey Epstein's July 23, 2019 Apparent Suicide Attempt part WIF under 7(A); Exemptions 5 (
Deliberative Process
Privilege), 6, 2 37 Psychological Reconstruction of Inmate Death 7(C), 7(E), and 7(F) applicable in part WIF under 7(A); Exemptions 6, 7(C), 3…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00099641.pdf
1–20 of 120 results · page 1 of 6
«
←
1
2
3
4
5
6
→
»
Results by Dataset
120 total
Set 8
11
Set 9
100
Set 10
7
Set 11
1
Set 12
1