EFTA00221747Dataset 9
2009-05-054p767w
…by and through her undersigned onds to/Defendant, JEFFREY Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 33, hereby resQ s: EPSTEIN'S First Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff as ft:46n General Objections extent that the 1. Plaintiff objects to Defendants Interrogatories to the protected by the attorney-client Interrogatories call for the disclosure of information cable privilege or immu nity, privilege, attorney work-product doctrine, or other appli whether created by statute or common law. Plaintiff claims such privileges and…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00221747.pdf
EFTA00221751Dataset 9
2009-05-054p773w
…by and through her undersigned onds toptefendant, JEFFREY Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 33, hereby resR s: V EPSTEIN'S First Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff as fo4oW General Objections extent that the 1. Plaintiff objects to Defendants Interrogatories to the protected by the attorney-client Interrogatories call for the disclosure of information cable privilege or immunity, privilege, attorney work-product doctrine, or other appli whether created by statute or common law. Plaintiff claims such privileges and and excludes…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00221751.pdf
EFTA00608692Dataset 9
2016-03-2917p1,201w
…729039, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 24, 1997) ("While discovery is not unlimited and may not unnecessarily intrude into private matters, in the instant case inquiry into private matters is clearly relevant to the subject matter of the suit. Accordingly, plaintiff Misty Weber shall respond to defendants' interrogatories concerning her sexual partners . . . ."). Moreover, generally speaking, instructions from attorneys to their clients not to answer questions at a deposition should be "limited to [issues regarding) privilege." Morales v. Zondo…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00608692.pdf
EFTA00722736Dataset 9
2009-04-1737p8,914w
…extent implicated by each Interrogatory, and excludes privileged and kotected information from any responses to Defendant's discovery. Any disclosure is Inadvertent and is not intended to waive those privileges or protections, which are specifically reserved. 2. Plaintiff objects to Defendants interrogatories to the extent that same are vague, ambiguous, incomprehensible and/or overly broad. P A EFTA00722743 Case 9:08-c0801491ftatTelst•Inesocument 79-2 Entered on FLSD 080ifel1/17,202l92"Page Doe No. 3 v. Epstein Page 6 Royal…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00722736.pdf