esc
Search documents
go
Browse entities
go
Corpus stats
go
About the data
go
AI settings
go
EFTA
Search
Search
Entities
About
Stats
Settings
⌘K
search
Search
Search syntax help
Dataset
Set 1
Set 2
Set 3
Set 4
Set 5
Set 6
Set 7
Set 8
Set 9
Set 10
Set 11
Set 12
Sort
Relevance
Most pages
Most words
Dataset
Newest
Oldest
Status
All
Extracted
Failed
DOJ Status
All
Removed
Available
Modified
Date Range
Undated only
–
Email Headers
Page Count
–
Saved Searches
+
39 results for “
"Contempt Proceedings"
”
Export
Keyboard Shortcuts
/
Focus search
Esc
Blur input
O
Open PDF
←
→
Paginate
EFTA00802097
Dataset 9
2018-10-26
7p
1,935w
…McAnlis, 721 F. 2d 334,337 (11th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1227 (1984). Therefore, the focus of the court's inquiry in civil
contempt proceedings
is not on the subjective beliefs or intent of the alleged contemnors in complying with the order, but whether in fact their conduct complied with the order at issue. Jim Walter Resources, Inc. v. Intl Union, United Mine Workers of America, 609 F.2d 165, 168 (5th Cir.1980). Conduct that evinces…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00802097.pdf
EFTA00037744
Dataset 8
2019-08-01
1p
80w
Subject:
overdue subpoena compliance: Amazon Ref. No. CRIMI031692 2019 DS
…Thu, 01 Aug 2019 21:05:59 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: 2019-06-24,_subpoena_to_Amazon.pdf Good afternoon, Amazon's response to the attached grand jury subpoena is overdue by several weeks. The FBI has emailed and left messages with your legal department several times over the past weeks without a response. Please respond promptly to resolve Amazon's non-compliance. Otherwise we will initiate
contempt proceedings
regarding your failure to comply with valid legal process. Sincerely, EFTA00037744
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00037744.pdf
EFTA00793920
Dataset 9
2018-04-11
27p
8,166w
…114428178.1 EFTA00793926 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 6355 Filed 04/11/18 Page 8 of 17 would be impossible for Movants to prove by clear and convincing evidence that Fowler White violated a clear, definite and unambiguous order of this Court. A. Movants' Burden of Proof: Clear and Convincing Evidence of Four Factors In civil
contempt proceedings
, a petitioner must first establish by clear and convincing evidence that the alleged contemnor violated a court's earlier order. Chairs v…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00793920.pdf
EFTA00793401
Dataset 9
2018-10-24
97p
18,954w
…communications with your 2 lawyer -- so if you looked at the order on 3 your own, then you can answer. 4 THE WITNESS: I don't recall. 5 BY MR. SCAROLA: 6 Q Are you aware that
contempt proceedings
are 7 pending in the federal bankruptcy court? 8 A Yes. 9 Q What is your understanding of what those 10 proceedings are about? 11 A It's in regards to the discovery of a disc 12 that was in possession…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00793401.pdf
EFTA00793957
Dataset 9
2018-04-19
8p
2,389w
…are not limited to (A) matters concerning the administration of the estate"); In re Ocean Warrior, Inc., 835 F.3d at 1318 (quoting In re Skinner, 917 F.2d 444 (10th Cir. 1990)) ("[c)ivil
contempt proceedings
arising out of core matters are themselves core matters."). To prevail in a civil contempt proceeding, the movant must establish by "'clear and convincing' proof that the underlying order was violated." Howard Johnson Co. v. IChitnani, 892 F.2d 1512, 1516 (11th Cir…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00793957.pdf
EFTA00793499
Dataset 9
2018-10-13
165p
32,130w
…sir? MR. LINK: I'm going to instruct you not to answer that question. It exceeds the scope of the permitted deposition by Judge Ray. 2nd Epstein Depo. Tr. at 8, attached as Exhibit B. Epstein's deposition was taken in connection with the pending
contempt proceedings
, and some of the answers that Epstein gave were unfavorable to L.M. L.M. is entitled to ask whether Epstein bears any bias against her. See, e.g., Davis v. Alaska, 415…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00793499.pdf
EFTA00802116
Dataset 9
2018-10-26
12p
4,437w
…On October 3, 2010, the Court struck the claims of Jane Doe and E.W. as they were not parties to and were not referenced in the Agreed Order. D.E. 6471. The Court also bifurcated the
contempt proceedings
in order to address liability for contempt before addressing discovery and damages if a finding of contempt is made. D.E. 6472. On October 29, 2018, the Court entered an Order Discharging Order to Show Cause Against Jeffrey Epstein, D.E…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00802116.pdf
EFTA00810602
Dataset 9
2018-08-17
12p
2,815w
…of confidential materials related to the Victims. Id. at 5-6. And ultimately, through machinations yet to be fully explained, it appears that confidential information about the Victims contained in those materials was transmitted to Epstein. In these
contempt proceedings
, the three Victims all successfully sought intervention to seek damages from Epstein and his attorneys. This Court then requested that the Victims file a summary of their damages. DE 6427. Pursuant to that directive, the Victims then filed what they…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00810602.pdf
EFTA00728793
Dataset 9
2008-06-30
18p
4,681w
…Judge Palermo's 3 If, as Jane Doe suggests, the Court ultimately proceeds first by way of civil and then only later by way of criminal contempt, Epstein would be entitled to invoke the Fifth Amendment only in the later criminal
contempt proceedings
. See Romero v. Drummond Co.. Inc., 480 F.3d 1234, 1243 (11' Cir. 2007) (noting that the right to remain silent attaches to criminal
contempt proceedings
). Of course, in any civil proceeding, the finder of fact can…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00728793.pdf
EFTA01079679
Dataset 9
2010-12-27
26p
6,194w
…emphasis added of civil and then only later If, as Jane Doe suggests, the Court ultimately proceeds first by way the Fifth Amendment only in by way of criminal contempt, Epstein would be entitled to invoke Co., Inc., 480 F.3d 1234. the later criminal
contempt proceedings
. See Romero v. Drummond es to criminal contempt 1243 (111° Cir. 2007) (noting that the right to remain silent attach of tact can draw an adverse proceedings). Of course, in any civil proceeding…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01079679.pdf
EFTA00811395
Dataset 9
2018-11-21
12p
4,431w
…On October 3, 2010, the Court struck the claims of Jane Doe and E.W. as they were not parties to and were not referenced in the Agreed Order. [D.E. 6471]. The Court also bifurcated the
contempt proceedings
in order to address liability for contempt before addressing discovery and damages if a finding of contempt is made. [D.E. 6472]. On October 29, 2018, the Court entered an Order Discharging Order to Show Cause Against Jeffrey Epstein, [D.E…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00811395.pdf
EFTA00020920
Dataset 8
2019-08-05
2p
247w
Subject:
FW: overdue subpoena compliance: Amazon Ref. No. CRIM1031692 2019 DS
From:
)"
To:
' )" <
…afternoon, Amazon's response to the attached grand jury subpoena is overdue by several weeks. The FBI has emailed and left messages with your legal department several times over the past weeks without a response. Please respond promptly to resolve Amazon's non-compliance. Otherwise we will initiate
contempt proceedings
regarding your failure to comply with valid legal process. Sincerely, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York One Saint Andrew's Plaza EFTA00020920 New York, NY 10007 EFTA00020921
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00020920.pdf
EFTA00037711
Dataset 8
2019-08-06
2p
414w
Subject:
: over ue su poena comp lance: mazon e o.
…Thursda Au: ust 01 2019 17:06 EFTA00037711 Subject: overdue subpoena compliance: Amazon Ref. No. CRIM1031692 2019 DS Good afternoon, Amazon's response to the attached grand jury subpoena is overdue by several weeks. The FBI has emailed and left messages with your legal department several times over the past weeks without a response. Please respond promptly to resolve Amazon's non-compliance. Otherwise we will initiate
contempt proceedings
regarding your failure to comply with valid legal process. Sincerely, EFTA00037712
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00037711.pdf
EFTA00021861
Dataset 8
2020-07-29
9p
4,346w
…charging her with, among other things, perjury in her deposition testimony. This is a serious violation of the Protective Order, and merits the commencement of
contempt proceedings
. We also write to seek reconsideration of the Court's July 23, 2020 ruling concluding that the transcripts of Ms. Maxwell's April 2016 deposition and Doe 1's deposition should be unsealed in their entirety (with the exception of non-party names). We recognize that a reconsideration motion is an extraordinary request…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00021861.pdf
EFTA00808803
Dataset 9
2018-04-13
10p
2,526w
…are belied by an extensive (eleven-page) response, replete with detailed legal citations and other arguments against the Victims' position that they are entitled to various forms of compensation. No depositions are required to inform Epstein of the Victims' claims. Moreover, the Eleventh Circuit has instructed that "at most, due process requires only `skeletal' protections in civil
contempt proceedings
." In re McLean, 794 F.3d 1313, 1324 (11th Cir. 2015). This Court is certainly providing far more than that through…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00808803.pdf
EFTA00094804
Dataset 9
2020-07-29
9p
4,346w
…charging her with, among other things, perjury in her deposition testimony. This is a serious violation of the Protective Order, and merits the commencement of
contempt proceedings
. We also write to seek reconsideration of the Court's July 23, 2020 ruling concluding that the transcripts of Ms. Maxwell's April 2016 deposition and Doe 1's deposition should be unsealed in their entirety (with the exception of non-party names). We recognize that a reconsideration motion is an extraordinary request…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00094804.pdf
EFTA00093509
Dataset 9
2p
823w
…a victim, considerable upset and distress. We have successfully threatened the British media with
contempt proceedings
which have resulted in the removal of many publications identifying our client — but put bluntly, our client should not need to be instructing lawyers to do that —and would not have needed to do so had the redaction process been conducted properly. If the court requires a list of examples of the inadequate redactions and resulting media, please let us know and we can…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00093509.pdf
EFTA00212808
Dataset 9
2011-04-13
4p
1,476w
Subject:
FW: Rule 6(e) Material??
From:
Paul Cassell [mailto
To:
(USAFLS); (USAFLS); Brad Edwards
…Supp. 2d 415 (W.D. N.Y. 2007) (Grand jury secrecy rule did not prohibit FBI special agent from testifying, in
contempt proceedings
against police chief for violating order sealing record of police officer's dismissed theft charges, as to circumstances leading to issuance of grand jury subpoena of local police records, since testimony concerned events occurring prior to grand jury investigation and subpoena, not what occurred before grand jury, and scope of investigation and contents of subpoena were no…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00212808.pdf
EFTA00092725
Dataset 9
2p
753w
…a victim, considerable upset and distress. We have successfully threatened the British media with
contempt proceedings
which have resulted in the removal of many publications identifying our client — but put bluntly, our client should not need to be instructing lawyers to do that —and would not have needed to do so had the redaction process been conducted properly. If the court requires a list of examples of the inadequate redactions and resulting media, please let us know and we can…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00092725.pdf
EFTA00808426
Dataset 9
2018-10-26
10p
2,816w
…testimony. Otherwise, Epstein is unfairly undertaking analysis for the first time while hearing their answers, and cross-examining the Intervenors, at the final evidentiary hearing. The request for advance depositions is not so unique or extraordinary when a party is faced with a claim of damages or sanctions. Other bankruptcy courts have permitted depositions on the topic of emotional distress in civil
contempt proceedings
. See In re Rivera Torres, 309 B.R. 643, 651 (B.A.P. 1st Cir. 2004…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00808426.pdf
1–20 of 39 results · page 1 of 2
«
←
1
2
→
»
Results by Dataset
39 total
Set 8
5
Set 9
34
Corpus: 1990-03-17 – 2025-12-01
←
October 2018
→
Mo
Tu
We
Th
Fr
Sa
Su
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Undated
(150,429)
None
Light
Medium
Heavy