""Calderone"" — Epstein Files Search

EFTA01133475Dataset 9

2013-09-123p532w

Subject: Tweets from Brad Lander, Michael Calderone, and 6 others

From: Twitter <[email protected]>To: jeffrey epstein [email protected]>

From: Twitter <info®twitter.com> To: jeffrey epstein leevacation®gmail.com> Subject: Tweets from Brad Lander, Michael Calderone, and 6 others Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 12:29:23 +0000 Jeffrey epstein, Here's what's trending on Twitter this week. Brad Lander @bradlander Sep Love this! RT @NYTMetro: The student who designed the city's "I Voted" slicker handed them out at one polling place nyti.ms/1eBrfYY 2013 NYC Primaries r;t:i Tracking the primary elections in New York…

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01133475.pdf

EFTA01367014Dataset 10

2013-12-311p331w

…taxable rcorre at the statutory ncorne tax rate of 25% n 2013 and 2014 The components of loss (noome) before imorne tax expense areas follows Year ended December 314 2013 2014 Use MIS Hong Kong O08 2,840 PRC 169 (1,364) Taal loss before room tax expense 4.777 1.276 The PRC mane tax tenets recognized in the combined statements of ccmprerenswe loss consists of deterred income tax Calderone amount of USS46 for the years ended December 31…

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01367014.pdf

EFTA00156400Dataset 9

2022-04-2945p15,329w

…The time periods of the two counts overlap completely. Namely, Count Five's period of 2001 to 2004 is "wholly within the time frame" of Count Three from 1994 to 2004, which substantially favors the Defendant on this Korfant factor. United States v. Calderone, 982 F.2d 42, 47 (2d Cir. 1992). The Government's attempt to minimize this factor by noting that most overt acts for Count Three occurred in the 1990s is simply not reflected in this circuit…

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00156400.pdf

EFTA00722615Dataset 9

…1136. Habeas corpus was not the proper remedy of defendant (he was indicted under this section, pleaded guilty and was sentenced) to determine whether this section was properly applied in his case. People a rel. Calderone v Jackson (1957, 3d Dept) 4 App Div 2d 914, 167 NYS2d 48. Where a defendant had been convicted and sentenced under this section as a first offender, a writ of error or coram nobis was not available to him to challenge such conviction…

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00722615.pdf