EFTA01134321Dataset 9
2013-06-1858p13,086w
…contemplated. 32 EFTA01134352 For similar reasons, a number of courts have concluded that the public interest in resolving disputes without litigation is sufficiently important to warrant the recognition of a mediation privilege. In Folb v. Motion Picture Industry Pension & Health Plans, 16 F.Supp.2d 1164 (C.D.Cal. 1998), the court described several ways in which the mediation privilege serves important public interests: (1) it would encourag[e] prompt, consensual resolution of disputes, minimizing the social and individual costs…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01134321.pdf
EFTA00598030Dataset 9
2008-07-0710p3,503w
…criminal justice system has long functioned on the assumption that crime victims should behave like good Victorian children -- seen but not heard. The Crime Victims' Rights Act sought to change this by making victim s independent participants in the criminal justice process." Kenna v. U.S. Dist. Court for C.D. Cal., 435 F.3d 1011, 1013 (9th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, because the CVRA is remedial legislation, courts should interpret it "liberally to facilitate and accomplish its purposes and intent." …
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00598030.pdf
EFTA01081969Dataset 9
2008-07-0710p3,496w
…criminal justice system has long functioned on the assumption that crime victims should behave like good Victorian children -- seen but not heard. The Crime Victims' Rights Act sought to change this by making victim s independent participants in the criminal justice process." Kenna v. U.S. Dist. Court for C.D. Cal., 435 F.3d 1011, 1013 (9th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, because the CVRA is remedial legislation, courts should interpret it "liberally to facilitate and accomplish its purposes and intent." …
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01081969.pdf
EFTA01089041Dataset 9
2015-03-028p4,992w
…LEXIS 25952, 12-13, 2001 WL 36134085 (C.D.Cal.2001) (letter and news release to publications announcing suit for misappropriation of trade secrets and other claims were protected by the litigation privilege "because they simply informed the recipients of the pendency of the litigation and the claims asserted"). All these well-settled principles lead inexorably to the conclusion that Dershowitz has no viable cause of action for statements made in and statements directly concerning the judicial pleadings. Indeed, Dershowitz…
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01089041.pdf