EFTA00032725
Dataset 8June 16, 20212 pages412 words From: ' (USANYS)" ci
To: ' (USANYS)"
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00032725.pdf
From: ' (USANYS)" ci
To: ' (USANYS)"
Cc: ' (USANYS)"
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 14:53:25 +0000
Attachments: Ex._C_Sealed.pdf
From: (USANYS) <
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 10:40 AM
To: (USANYS)
Cc: (USANYS)
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Can I see our original application to Judge Sweet? And I assume there was no transcript before Judge S?
From: (USANYS)
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 5:45 PM
To: (USANYS) <
Cc: I (USANYS) (USANYS) <
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
In the spirit of completeness, I'm also attaching their replies.
From: (USANYS) <
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 5:20 PM
To: (USANYS) <
Cc: (USANYS) >; (USANYS) <
Subject: Re: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Goodness!
Associate U.S. Attorney
Southern District of New York
On Jun 15, 2021, at 5:06 PM, (USANYS) < wrote:
She filed 12 (!!) separate MOLs as a way to evade the Court's page limits. Defense attorneys have started doing that
over the last few years.
From: (USANYS)
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 4:25 PM
To: (USANYS) <
EFTA00032725
Cc: (USANYS) <I >; (USANYS) <
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Dumb Q: why does Maxwell have two memos of law?
From: (USANYS)
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 2:19 PM
To: (USANYS) <
Cc: (USANYS) < M>; (USANYS) <
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Per our discussion, I am attaching: (1) Maxwell's two briefs raising the suppression argument; (2) the transcript of the
McMahon proceedings and her opinion (Ex D, E, G); (3) our brief (see pp 59-115); and (4) the exhibits we attached to our
motion (Ex 4-7). Judge Nathan has said that she will resolve the suppression motions "at a later time" ahead of trial.
Thanks very much.
From: (USANYS) <
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 10:09 AM
To: (USANYS)
Cc: (USANYS) (USANYS) <
Subject: RE: Question re AM/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Sure, set a time other than 2:00. I'm in the office. Or Webex
From: (USANYS)
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 9:11 AM
To: (USANYS) <
Cc: (USANYS) (USANYS) <
Subject: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Hi=,
We had an issue come up related to the upcoming suppression hearing (no date set yet, although we expect one)
related to that we'd like your thoughts on. Let us know a convenient time to stop by over the next
few days, thanks.
Chief, Public Corruption Unit
U.S. Attorney's Office
Southern District of New York
EFTA00032726
AI Analysis
Summarize this document or ask questions about its contents using Claude.
Typical cost: less than $0.01 per query with Haiku. Model can be changed in Settings.
Add API Key in SettingsFrom: ' (USANYS)" ci
To: ' (USANYS)"
Cc: ' (USANYS)"
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 14:53:25 +0000
Attachments: Ex._C_Sealed.pdf
From: (USANYS) <
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 10:40 AM
To: (USANYS)
Cc: (USANYS)
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Can I see our original application to Judge Sweet? And I assume there was no transcript before Judge S?
From: (USANYS)
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 5:45 PM
To: (USANYS) <
Cc: I (USANYS) (USANYS) <
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
In the spirit of completeness, I'm also attaching their replies.
From: (USANYS) <
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 5:20 PM
To: (USANYS) <
Cc: (USANYS) >; (USANYS) <
Subject: Re: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Goodness!
Associate U.S. Attorney
Southern District of New York
On Jun 15, 2021, at 5:06 PM, (USANYS) < wrote:
She filed 12 (!!) separate MOLs as a way to evade the Court's page limits. Defense attorneys have started doing that
over the last few years.
From: (USANYS)
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 4:25 PM
To: (USANYS) <
EFTA00032725
Cc: (USANYS) <I >; (USANYS) <
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Dumb Q: why does Maxwell have two memos of law?
From: (USANYS)
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 2:19 PM
To: (USANYS) <
Cc: (USANYS) < M>; (USANYS) <
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Per our discussion, I am attaching: (1) Maxwell's two briefs raising the suppression argument; (2) the transcript of the
McMahon proceedings and her opinion (Ex D, E, G); (3) our brief (see pp 59-115); and (4) the exhibits we attached to our
motion (Ex 4-7). Judge Nathan has said that she will resolve the suppression motions "at a later time" ahead of trial.
Thanks very much.
From: (USANYS) <
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 10:09 AM
To: (USANYS)
Cc: (USANYS) (USANYS) <
Subject: RE: Question re AM/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Sure, set a time other than 2:00. I'm in the office. Or Webex
From: (USANYS)
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 9:11 AM
To: (USANYS) <
Cc: (USANYS) (USANYS) <
Subject: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Hi=,
We had an issue come up related to the upcoming suppression hearing (no date set yet, although we expect one)
related to that we'd like your thoughts on. Let us know a convenient time to stop by over the next
few days, thanks.
Chief, Public Corruption Unit
U.S. Attorney's Office
Southern District of New York
EFTA00032726