From: Christian Everdell
To: '
Cc:
"Bobbi C. Sternheim, Esq."
Laura Menninger Jeff Pagliuca
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Stip
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2021 02:03:31 +0000
Attachments: Stipulatio Trial_Testimony.DOCX
Following-up on our conversation today, is the revised stipulation acceptable to the government?
From:
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 20217:03 PM
To: Christian Everdell
Cc:-
• Bobbi C. Sternheim, Esq. • Laura Menninger
; Jeff Pagliuca <
Subject: Stip
Hey Chris,
Following up on our conversation today regarding the stip, would you agree to have the sentence say that the document is
a "true and accurate copy of the transcript of one witness's trial testimony, but not the full trial transcript, given on
February 26 . . . ."? If so, we are fine with the stip — and, of course, happy to consider other language that makes the same
point.
Thanks,
Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
EFTA00014647
AI Analysis
Summarize this document or ask questions about its contents using Claude.
Typical cost: less than $0.01 per query with Haiku. Model can be changed in Settings.